Harvard University is providing a grasp class in double requirements.
As the Herald reported, Harvard President Claudine Gay might want to make three corrections to her Ph.D. dissertation amid plagiarism allegations, in line with a number of experiences.
The college’s Honor Code is obvious: “Cheating on exams or problem sets, plagiarizing or misrepresenting the ideas or language of someone else as one’s own, falsifying data, or any other instance of academic dishonesty violates the standards of our community, as well as the standards of the wider world of learning and affairs.”
Harvard means enterprise: “Students who, for whatever reason, submit work either not their own or without clear attribution to its sources will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including requirement to withdraw from the College,” in line with Harvard’s website.
Except for Claudine Gay.
School newspaper the Harvard Crimson famous that the Harvard Corporation revealed, partly: “The members … concluded that Gay’s inadequate citations, while regrettable, did not constitute research misconduct.”
Regrettable. Is that one other approach of claiming it relies upon “on the context?”
The Corporation is doing an admirable job of circling the wagons and offering Gay with a formidable Teflon coating.
It supported Gay when, throughout a Congressional listening to earlier this month, she refused to characterize requires the genocide of Jews as a breach of Harvard’s code of conduct. This amid a surge in antisemitism on campuses following the Oct. 7 terrorist assault on Israel.
Donors pulled their funding, well-known alums referred to as for her resignation. But the Harvard Corporation had her again: Gay stays as president.
In an announcement, it stated: “Our extensive deliberations affirm our confidence that President Gay is the right leader to help our community heal and to address the very serious societal issues we are facing.”
Even now, as a congressional committee is increasing its probe into antisemitism at Harvard to incorporate Gay’s work, the Harvard Corporation isn’t budging.
At what price to Harvard?
According to Fox Business, Harvard reported a 17% decline in its early admissions functions in comparison with a yr in the past because it stays mired in controversy over its dealing with of antisemitism on campus. The bloom is off the rose.
The newest “discipline for thee but not for me” place on plagiarism can solely additional erode the varsity’s fame.
The Crimson reported that 27 college students have been compelled to withdraw from Harvard College in the course of the 2020-2021 tutorial yr as a consequence of tutorial dishonesty, citing a report final yr. Plagiarism and examination dishonest have been probably the most cited issues in Honor Council instances.
It’s simple to think about an expelled scholar having a “hey, wait a minute” second when studying the most recent about Gay. Perhaps proper earlier than calling a lawyer.
Neither President Gay nor the Harvard Corporation are doing the varsity any favors. It’s dropping donors, it’s dropping integrity, and it’s dropping its once-lofty fame.
What will it take the Harvard Corporation to comprehend that it must lose its president.
Source: www.bostonherald.com”