Two law enforcement officials will face misconduct instances over the dealing with of reviews of indecent publicity by Wayne Couzens earlier than he murdered Sarah Everard, a watchdog has stated.
A Metropolitan Police constable will face a gross misconduct listening to and a Kent Police sergeant will face a misconduct assembly after Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) investigations into the dealing with of separate reviews of indecent publicity.
The constable will face allegations they breached police requirements {of professional} behaviour for duties and for alleged failings over the best way inquiries had been progressed into two incidents involving Couzens which occurred in February 2021.
On two separate events that month Couzens uncovered himself to feminine employees at a drive via quick meals outlet in south London.
Couzens pleaded responsible to each these offences on Monday.
Just weeks later he went on to kidnap, rape, and homicide Ms Everard in March 2021, against the law for which he’s presently serving a whole-life sentence.
The constable can also be accused of breaching requirements referring to honesty and integrity over components of an account offered to IOPC investigators.
Read extra
Sarah Everard’s killer pleads responsible to 3 counts of indecent publicity
Met Police officer and ex-PC jailed for sharing offensive messages with Sarah Everard’s killer
The sergeant is alleged to have did not comply with all cheap strains of enquiry earlier than closing a case the place a person driving a automobile that was recognized as belonging to Couzens uncovered himself to a pedestrian in Dover in 2015.
An investigation discovered no proof to counsel that Couzens was recognized as a police officer and he was not spoken to by investigating officers.
IOPC Regional Director Sal Naseem stated: “We have been unable to publish our findings until now due to the risk of prejudicing criminal proceedings against Couzens.
“Now that these have concluded it will likely be for the Metropolitan and Kent police forces to organise disciplinary proceedings which is able to think about the proof we have now gathered and decide whether or not the allegations in opposition to the officers are confirmed or not.”
Assistant Chief Constable of Kent Police Tracey Harman said: “The IOPC has made a dedication that the officer concerned must be topic to a misconduct assembly on the premise that the allegations breached the police skilled requirements for duties and duties. It would due to this fact be inappropriate to remark additional.”
Source: information.sky.com”