The former king of Spain has begun an attraction bid after shedding a High Court combat with an ex-lover who has accused him of spying on and harassing her.
Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn, a Danish businesswoman, has taken authorized motion towards Juan Carlos, who abdicated in 2014, and is looking for damages for private harm.
Carlos, 84, denies wrongdoing and disputes claims made towards him.
Lawyers representing the previous monarch argued that he was “entitled to immunity from the jurisdiction of the English courts in his capacity as a senior member of the Spanish royal family”.
But a High Court decide disagreed.
Mr Justice Nicklin dominated earlier this 12 months that the declare may go forward in England.
Two Court of Appeal judges in July allowed Juan Carlos to problem a number of the conclusions reached by Mr Justice Nicklin.
Three attraction judges, Lady Justice King, Lady Justice Simler and Lord Justice Popplewell, are resulting from take into account detailed arguments at a Court of Appeal listening to in London.
Lawyers representing Ms zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn have argued that the previous king’s attraction bid must be dismissed.
Judges have heard how Juan Carlos dominated from 1975 till his abdication in June 2014 and the succession of his son King Felipe VI.
They have been advised that Ms zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn, who lives in England and has a house in Shropshire, needs an “injunction and damages” ensuing from “a continuous and ongoing campaign of harassment” towards her, “commenced” by the previous king from 2012, following the “break-up of an intimate romantic relationship” and her “refusal to let (the former king) use a financial sum irrevocably gifted to her, or to return other gifts”.
Lawyers representing her have alleged to judges that conduct “includes (the former king) or his agents smearing her and her business in the media, following her, entering her home in Shropshire, and bugging her homes and electronic devices”.
Mr Justice Nicklin rejected the argument that, regardless of his abdication, Carlos remained a “sovereign” and was entitled to private immunity underneath the State Immunity Act 1978.
He had additionally mentioned Carlos was not a member of the present king’s family throughout the which means of that act.
Mr Justice Nicklin mentioned the previous king’s place underneath the Spanish structure was “entirely honorary” and supplied him “no continuing role”.
Source: information.sky.com”