In addition to selecting will every the entire commonwealth’s prime management positions, voters will probably be requested to determine on 4 statewide poll questions which may considerably change Bay State coverage.
“Question 1 would create a 4 percent tax on the portion of a person’s annual income above $1 million and constitutionally dedicate the funds to be spent on transportation and public education. Only people who earn more than $1 million annually will be impacted; 99% of us won’t pay a penny more,” the Fair Share for Massachusetts marketing campaign says in each Yes on 1 e-mail.
Opponents have maintained for months that the regulation will result in flight from the state among the many rich.
“If passed, it would be one of the state’s highest income tax increases in history and immediately impose an 80% tax increase on tens of thousands of small business owners, large employers, and retirees. And, it would give politicians a blank check to spend billions of taxpayer dollars however they want, with no accountability,” the No on Question 1 marketing campaign’s web site reads.
Question 2 will decide whether or not the state will set a flooring for dental care spending by insurers. Right now there isn’t any such minimal for spending. Advocates of setting the ground at 83% of premiums say it’s going to result in higher care.
“A Yes vote would regulate dental insurance rates, including by requiring companies to spend at least 83% of premiums on member dental expenses and quality improvements instead of administrative expenses, and by making other changes to dental insurance regulations,” proponents say on their marketing campaign web page.
“Question 2 is an anti-consumer proposal that will increase costs for Massachusetts families and employers — nearly 40% in one recent study — and will result in denying thousands of residents access to much needed dental care,” opponents say.
Question 3 will decide how liquor licenses are distributed within the Commonwealth.
“The ballot question modernizes MA laws to allow for the safe expansion of alcohol licenses. It calls for the state to progressively double the number of allowed beer and wine licenses a company or individual is allowed to hold, going from nine to 18,” Proponents stated to launch the Yes on 3 Campaign.
“Our alcohol licensing laws do need serious reforms, but this ballot measure is not the answer. It offers an incomplete solution to a complex problem, doing little to promote competition or expand consumer choice,” opponents say within the official voter info information.
The final query isn’t described within the voter info information despatched out by the secretary of state’s workplace, because it was added to the poll after these guides have been printed.
It asks voters whether or not a regulation handed this summer time, the Work and Family Mobility Act, ought to stay on the books.
“The question threatens to revoke a law that allows immigrants without status to drive to work or take their children to the doctor with a valid driver’s license in their pocket and proper insurance coverage on their car, making the roads safer for everyone in Massachusetts,” proponents say on their webpage. A sure vote would preserve the regulation in place.
“The Registry of Motor Vehicles does not have the capability or expertise necessary to verify documents from other countries and notes that, if this bill becomes law, Massachusetts drivers’ licenses will no longer confirm that a person is who they say they are,” the query’s official voter information argument reads. A no vote would repeal the regulation.
The normal election is Tuesday.
Source: www.bostonherald.com”