By ASHRAF KHALIL
WASHINGTON (AP) — Lawyers for Trump ally Steve Bannon didn’t name any witnesses and declined to testify himself in his contempt of Congress trial on Thursday and as a substitute argued the choose ought to simply acquit him, saying prosecutors hadn’t confirmed their case.
The determination to forego calling any witnesses in Bannon’s protection cleared the best way for closing arguments to start Friday. The choose didn’t instantly rule on the movement for an acquittal and the case is prone to find yourself within the jury’s palms by noon Friday.
One of Bannon’s legal professionals, David Schoen, contended they need to in a position to name Rep. Bennie Thompson, the Democratic chairman of the House Jan. 6 committee which had subpoenaed Bannon’s testimony, to query him below oath as a substitute of the congressional lawyer who testified throughout the trial. The choose has beforehand dominated towards that request.
In courtroom, Bannon nodded and smiled as one other of his legal professionals, Evan Corcoran, argued that the timing of when Bannon may adjust to the subpoena was versatile and stated testimony from the House panel’s chief lawyer, Kristin Amerling, had made clear “that the dates were in flux.”
In making the argument, Corcoran stated that “no reasonable juror could conclude that Mr. Bannon refused to comply.”
Bannon’s workforce additionally advised the choose that Bannon noticed no level in testifying for the reason that earlier rulings had gutted his deliberate avenues of protection. Schoen stated Bannon “understands that he would be barred from telling the true facts.”
Corcoran then rested the protection case. U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols stated he would rule in a while the movement for an acquittal.
Throughout the trial Corcoran has tried to determine that the deadline for the onetime Trump strategist to seem earlier than the House committee investigating the Capitol riot was versatile so long as the 2 sides had been on negotiating phrases.
In opening statements Corcoran argued that the costs towards Bannon had been politically motivated and that the previous adviser was engaged in good-faith negotiations with the congressional committee when he was charged. “No one ignored the subpoena,” Corcoran advised the jury.
In actuality, Corcoran stated, one among Bannon’s earlier legal professionals, Robert Costello, contacted an lawyer for the House committee to specific a few of Bannon’s considerations about testifying.
“They did what two lawyers do. They negotiated,” Corcoran stated, including that Bannon and his authorized workforce believed “the dates of the subpoena were not fixed; they were flexible.”
At different instances within the courtroom on Thursday, Bannon, sporting two collared shirts, a T-shirt and a black jacket, fiddled along with his phone and rocked backwards and forwards on his chair.
Bannon was in an unofficial capability to Trump on the time of the rebel on Jan. 6, 2021, and is charged with defying a congressional subpoena from the House committee investigating the aftermath of the 2020 election and the occasions main as much as the lethal riot.
Bannon was indicted in November on two counts of prison contempt of Congress, a month after the Justice Department obtained the House panel’s referral. Each rely carries a minimal of 30 days of jail and so long as a yr behind bars upon conviction.
The Justice Department rested its case Wednesday after calling simply two witnesses: Amerling, and FBI particular agent Stephen Hart. The prosecution’s case was dominated by testimony from Amerling, who defined the extent to which the committee tried to interact Bannon and the timeline main as much as the missed deadline.
During cross examination Corcoran requested Amerling whether or not it was widespread for witnesses to seem earlier than a congressional committee a number of weeks after the deadline date on a subpoena. Amerling answered “yes,” however added solely “when witnesses are cooperating with the committee.”
Amerling stated Bannon was uncooperative from the beginning, so there was no such leeway.
The committee heard nothing from Bannon till after the primary deadline had handed, at which level his lawyer despatched a letter to the committee stating that Bannon was protected by Trump’s declare of government privilege and wouldn’t be offering paperwork or showing. The committee responded in writing that Trump’s declare was invalid — Trump was now not president, and Bannon was not employed on the White House on the time of the riot.
The panel gave Bannon a tough deadline of Oct. 14 to come back earlier than the committee. When that deadline handed, the committee chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., wrote Bannon’s lawyer on Oct. 15 threatening prison prosecution.
The committee, which is holding a main time listening to Thursday, wished to talk with Bannon as a result of it had data that Bannon was actively concerned in planning, logistics and fundraising for efforts by Trump, a Republican, to overturn the 2020 election and cease Congress from certifying Democrat Joe Biden’s victory. The subpoena demanded any paperwork or communications referring to Trump and different individuals in his orbit, together with lawyer Rudy Giuliani and extremist teams such because the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers.
The emphasis on the subpoena timeline is likely one of the few avenues of protection that Nichols left Bannon’s authorized workforce after a listening to final week. Nichols dominated that main parts of Bannon’s deliberate protection had been irrelevant and couldn’t be launched in courtroom. The choose stated Bannon couldn’t declare he believed he was coated by government privilege, which permits presidents to withhold confidential data from the courts and the legislative department, or that he was appearing on the recommendation of his legal professionals.
___
Follow AP’s protection of the Jan. 6 committee hearings at https://apnews.com/hub/capitol-siege
Source: www.bostonherald.com”