By ASHRAF KHALIL
WASHINGTON (AP) — Steve Bannon, a longtime ally of former President Donald Trump, was convicted on Friday of contempt prices for defying a congressional subpoena from the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 riot on the U.S. Capitol.
Bannon, 68, was convicted after a four-day trial in federal court docket on two counts: one for refusing to seem for a deposition and the opposite for refusing to offer paperwork in response to the committee’s subpoena. The jury of 8 males and 4 ladies deliberated slightly below three hours.
He faces as much as two years in federal jail when he’s sentenced on Oct. 21. Each rely carries a minimal sentence of 30 days in jail.
David Schoen, one among Bannon’s legal professionals stated outdoors the courthouse the decision wouldn’t stand. “This is round one,” Schoen stated. “You will see this case reversed on appeal.”
Likewise, Bannon himself stated, “We may have lost the battle here today; we’re not going to lose this war.”
He thanked the jurors for his or her service and stated he had just one disappointment — “and that is the gutless members of that show trial committee, the J-6 committee didn’t have the guts to come down here and testify.”
Prosecutors had been simply as agency on the opposite facet of the decision.
“The subpoena to Stephen Bannon was not an invitation that could be rejected or ignored,” Matthew Graves, the U.S. lawyer in Washington, stated in an announcement. “Mr. Bannon had an obligation to appear before the House Select Committee to give testimony and provide documents. His refusal to do so was deliberate, and now a jury has found that he must pay the consequences.”
The committee sought Bannon’s testimony over his involvement in Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Bannon had initially argued that his testimony was protected by Trump’s declare of govt privilege. But the House panel and the Justice Department contend such a declare is doubtful as a result of Trump had fired Bannon from the White House in 2017 and Bannon was thus a personal citizen when he was consulting with the then-president within the run-up to the riot on Jan. 6, 2021.
Bannon’s legal professionals tried to argue through the trial that he didn’t refuse to cooperate and that the dates “were in flux.” They pointed to the truth that Bannon had reversed course shortly earlier than the trial kicked off — after Trump waived his objection — and had supplied to testify earlier than the committee.
In closing arguments Friday morning, each side re-emphasized their major positions from the trial. The prosecution maintained that Bannon willfully ignored clear and specific deadlines, and the protection claimed Bannon believed these deadlines had been versatile and topic to negotiation.
Bannon was served with a subpoena on Sept. 23 final 12 months ordering him to offer requested paperwork to the committee by Oct. 7 and seem in particular person by Oct. 14. Bannon was indicted in November on two counts of prison contempt of Congress, a month after the Justice Department acquired the House panel’s referral.
Bannon’s lawyer Evan Corcoran advised jurors Friday in his closing arguments that these deadlines had been mere “placeholders” whereas legal professionals on all sides negotiated phrases.
Corcoran stated the committee “rushed to judgment” as a result of it “wanted to make an example of Steve Bannon.”
Corcoran additionally hinted that the federal government’s foremost witness, Jan. 6 committee chief counsel Kristin Amerling, was personally biased. Amerling admitted on the stand that she is a lifelong Democrat and has been buddies with one of many prosecutors for years. Corcoran additionally vaguely hinted that the signature of Jan. 6 committee chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss) seemed completely different on the subpoena than on different letters however dropped that matter when the prosecution objected.
Prosecutors centered on the sequence of letters exchanged between the Jan. 6 committee and Bannon’s legal professionals. The correspondence reveals Thompson instantly dismissing Bannon’s declare that he was exempted by Trump’s declare of govt privilege and explicitly threatening Bannon with prison prosecution.
“The defense wants to make this hard, difficult and confusing,” stated Assistant U.S. Attorney Amanda Vaughn in her closing assertion. “This is not difficult. This is not hard. There were only two witnesses because it’s as simple as it seems.”
The protection Thursday motioned for an acquittal, saying the prosecution had not proved it’s case. In making his movement for acquittal earlier than U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, Bannon lawyer Corcoran stated that “no reasonable juror could conclude that Mr. Bannon refused to comply.”
Once the movement was made the protection rested its case with out placing on any witnesses, telling Nichols that Bannon noticed no level in testifying because the choose’s earlier rulings had gutted his deliberate avenues of protection. Among different issues, Bannon’s group was barred from calling as witnesses House Speaker Nancy Pelosi or members of the House panel.
____
Associated Press reporters Michael Balsamo and Gary Fields contributed to this report.
Follow AP’s protection of the Jan. 6 committee hearings at https://apnews.com/hub/capitol-siege
Source: www.bostonherald.com”