Adam Montgomery, the New Hampshire man accused of punching his 5-year-old daughter to demise in December 2019, waived his scheduled arraignment on fees associated to her homicide and can stay in jail with out bail.
“The defendant assents to being held without bail at this time, but reserves his right to request a hearing in the future,” Jesse O’Neill, the senior assistant New Hampshire legal professional normal, wrote in a Tuesday submitting.
Montgomery, 32, had already been in jail on a medley of fees — together with endangering the welfare of a kid, second-degree assault and interference with custody — associated to Harmony’s disappearance.
That disappearance investigation shifted to a murder investigation in August and, on Monday, Adam Montgomery’s fees have been elevated to offenses together with second-degree homicide, falsifying bodily proof, abuse of a corpse and tampering with a witness.
That final cost accuses Montgomery of creating Kayla Montgomery — Harmony’s step-mother who can be going through a slew of fees, together with defrauding the state’s welfare program by falsely claiming Harmony as a dependent throughout a interval she was recognized by the state to be lacking — “to testify or inform falsely” on Adam Montgomery’s behalf, in response to the charging doc.
Montgomery was arrested on the recent fees at about 10:30 a.m. Monday, in response to Manchester Chief of Police Allen Aldenberg, whose supply of this information throughout a press convention later that day was an emotional one which concluded with a plea that these listening “make every effort to do something nice for a child today” in Harmony’s honor.
In the lead-up to the arrest on the brand new fees, Montgomery’s case was a flurry of motions to suppress varied proof in his case, together with statements he made to police on Dec. 31, 2021, and in his post-arrest interview on Jan. 4. His requests have been each granted and denied partly in rulings filed on Oct. 19.
“Well, your daughter had some injuries that you know about when you lived on Gilford Street,” a Manchester detective is quoted as saying through the interview Jan. 4 included in Superior Court Justice Amy Messer’s ruling. “… I’m referring to her having some good marks … Marks that were left on her by you.”
“Absolutely not. I have nothing else to say,” Montgomery replied. Thirteen minutes later, Montgomery would state, “You know what, man, like I don’t even want to talk anymore. Like this is just beating around the bush. It just seems a little to silly to me.”
The state had filed a movement Oct. 4 arguing that the sooner “I have nothing else to say” assertion was “ambiguous and equivocal and was consequently not a valid invocation of his right to remain silent,” however conceded that the latter assertion is an “unambiguous assertion of his right to remain silent.”
Messer agreed and dominated that any assertion after that assertion could be suppressed.
Source: www.bostonherald.com”