It was the social media whodunnit that captivated the nation and spawned a nine-day trial on the High Court earlier this summer time.
Now, the Vardy v Rooney libel case will lastly attain its conclusion, when the judgment is handed down by Mrs Justice Steyn round noon.
As the judgment might be distant, it is unlikely both Rebekah Vardy or Coleen Rooney will attend courtroom.
The case revolves round a social media publish shared by Rooney in October 2019 which rapidly went viral.
Coleen Rooney revealed her “sting operation” to smoke out somebody she mentioned was liable for leaking “false stories” about her non-public life to the press.
She mentioned she planted these pretend tales on her private Instagram account and altered the privateness settings to make them seen to only her one suspect – Rebekah Vardy – so after they ended up headlines within the Sun, she may pin down the leak.
The web rapidly christened Rooney Wagatha Christie – in a nod to the world-famous British crime novelist Agatha Christie.
What is the Wagatha Christie case all about: Read extra
Vardy has at all times strenuously denied the accusations, and in June 2020 filed an utility to sue Rooney for libel, claiming she suffered “very serious harm to her reputation” as a direct results of the publish.
Rooney has defended the declare on the idea of reality and that it’s within the public curiosity.
After over two years of authorized wrangling, and varied unsuccessful makes an attempt at mediation, the case is now reaching its shut.
Various celebrities – together with Danielle Lloyd and Boris Johnson’s father Stanley – have even taken sides within the very public case.
And earlier this month it was revealed that Channel 4 might be making a drama based mostly on the trial.
During the trial, Vardy was questioned about her earlier relationship with pop star Peter Andre, Rooney spoke about previous troublesome patches in her marriage, and her husband Wayne Rooney gave proof telling the courtroom he had recognized nothing concerning the “sting” operation till he noticed his spouse’s Instagram publish – similar to the remainder of us.
Follow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, or Spreaker
Regardless of the result of the trial, the highlight on celebrities promoting tales to newspapers is more likely to affect showbiz journalism going ahead.
And questions over on-line privateness rights in terms of sharing your private life on social media will inevitably have repercussions for everybody – not simply the wealthy and well-known and their enviably Instagramable lives.
Source: information.sky.com”