A nurse accused of murdering infants has denied she “enjoyed the aftermath” of a kid’s loss of life.
Lucy Letby gave proof for a seventh day at Manchester Crown Court, the place she is standing trial charged with murdering seven infants and making an attempt to homicide 10 others.
The kids had been allegedly attacked on the Countess of Chester Hospital between June 2015 and June 2016.
Letby’s cross-examination entered its third day on Friday, persevering with with the case of Child C – a child boy who died within the early hours of 14 June 2015.
He was fed at 11pm earlier than collapsing simply quarter-hour later, and died 5 hours later in his mom’s arms, the court docket has heard.
Lucy Letby accused of ‘faking hospital notes’ for alibi – updates from court docket as they occurred
“You enjoyed the aftermath of this, didn’t you?” prosecutor Nick Johnson KC requested Letby.
“No,” she replied.
A colleague beforehand testified that they needed to maintain pulling Letby from the household room as Child C died.
“Why were you so keen to involve yourself with the family as they cradled their dying son?” Mr Johnson requested.
Letby mentioned: “I agree I probably went round at some point, but not repeatedly and I don’t recall my colleague having to pull me back out.”
She mentioned she might have been serving to the household make mementoes, together with hand and footprints. But the prosecution claimed it will have been uncommon to do that whereas he was nonetheless alive.
Facebook searches and WhatsApp messages
Letby’s Facebook searches and WhatsApp messages had been additionally proven to the court docket.
The prosecution claims Child D, a child lady, died after an intentional injection of air into her bloodstream. She collapsed thrice – on the third time she couldn’t be revived.
Letby looked for Child D’s father on Facebook, three months after the toddler died regardless of initially telling police she did not bear in mind his baby, the jury was informed.
A textual content message from one in all Letby’s colleagues after the loss of life of Child D expressed shock on the loss of life.
“We had such a rubbish night. Our job is just far too sad sometimes,” Letby texted.
The colleague requested what occurred and Letby informed her Child D had died.
“What!!!! But she was improving What happened,” the lady texted.
In a second textual content, her colleague mentioned: “Wanna chat? I can’t believe you were on again. You are having such a tough time.”
Letby described the scenario as “so upsetting for everyone. Parents absolutely distraught, dad screaming”.
Letby later texted her colleague saying: “Hmm well it’s happened & that’s it. Got to carry on. I finish for nearly 2 weeks after next Fri, so I’ll keep ploughing on.”
The prosecution claimed that is proof she wasn’t affected by the toddler’s loss of life.
“You were enjoying this, weren’t you, Lucy Letby?” Mr Johnson requested her.
“No,” she replied.
Further texts urged colleagues felt there was one thing suspicious in regards to the variety of deaths going down on the neonatal unit.
“There was just something odd about that night,” a colleague texted Letby – referring to the night time Child D died – earlier than including that she was “just speculating”.
‘Falsified’ paperwork
Letby additionally denied she falsified paperwork to present herself an alibi on the time Child D fatally collapsed.
The prosecution claims Letby altered paperwork to make it seem as if she was taking care of one other child when Child D collapsed.
“Did you think the paperwork wouldn’t tie you to Child D at the time she collapsed?” Mr Johnson asks.
After asking him to rephrase the query, Letby mentioned: “No, I had other babies. I wasn’t caring for Child D.”
The defendant, from Hereford, the fees in opposition to her.
The trial continues on Wednesday.
Source: information.sky.com”