Omid Scobie has refused to apologise to the Royal Family after the King and Princess of Wales had been named in his new guide because the senior royals alleged to have questioned the pores and skin color of Prince Harry and Meghan’s son earlier than he was born.
The royal biographer has been on the centre of a media storm after copies of Endgame had been briefly pulled from cabinets within the Netherlands over what the writer, Xander Uitgevers, known as an “error”.
When requested on Thursday if he needed to apologise to the Royal Family, the 42-year-old stated: “It is not for me to apologise, as I still want to know what has happened.
“[The buck] doesn’t cease with me, there are irresponsible folks on this nation which have damaged the regulation and repeated names that ought to by no means have been damaged.”
Having previously insisted that he never submitted a book that included the names, Mr Scobie swore on Thursday that the incident was not part of a publicity stunt.
“On my and my household’s life,” he said, when quizzed by Newsnight’s Victoria Derbyshire.
He added: “It is severe, I really feel harm by a number of the conspiracy theories that this can be a publicity stunt and that I’m in cahoots with my ‘pal’ – all of that is irritating.”
The author stated he has acquired 20 loss of life threats prior to now week because of the scandal.
“Having done this job full-time for six years, I am used to it,” he stated. “The skin is thick, but it is sad that has become the norm.”
The unsubstantiated allegation in opposition to the Royal Family was first made by the Duchess of Sussex in her March 2021 interview with Oprah Winfrey wherein she stated a senior member raised “concerns” about her son Archie’s pores and skin color earlier than he was born.
Read extra:
Who is Omid Scobie?
Endgame ‘error’ will not assist Harry and Meghan
Five revelations from the controversial new guide
Mr Scobie’s guide claims that, within the aftermath of the Oprah interview, Meghan wrote a letter to the King expressing concern about unconscious bias within the Royal Family.
In the UK model of Endgame, Mr Scobie wrote that in her letter to the King, Meghan revealed “two identities” of these “involved in the exchange”.
“Laws in the United Kingdom prevent me from reporting who they were,” he wrote within the guide.
There has been no proof that has been revealed since to recommend the allegations are true.
On Thursday, Mr Scobie reiterated that an investigation has been launched into how the names had been included within the translated model of his guide and that he “looks forward to finding out more about it”.
Meanwhile, Buckingham Palace stated it’s contemplating whether or not it ought to take motion.
Source: information.sky.com”