Homeowners hit with a hosepipe ban after months of poor water provide say their supplier needs to be stripped of its working licence.
One resident in East Sussex stated he and his neighbours had no water for 23 days earlier than their faucets had been turned on once more on Friday.
From Monday, they face a £1,000 tremendous in the event that they flout a new hosepipe ban being launched within the South East Water space.
One motive for the ban is that extra individuals are working from house and utilizing extra water, stated the corporate.
At the identical time the agency, which provides handled consuming water, admitted its reservoirs and underground aquifers had been topped up.
The downside, it stated, was that it will probably’t deal with that uncooked water shortly sufficient when demand for clear water will increase.
Graeme McCracken, a semi-retired firm director, stated: “It’s taking place persistently. In the final six months, we have had two outages of greater than 5 days, one simply earlier than Christmas, after which the newest one in all 23 days.
“It’s shocking that you can’t supply water in this country.
“Now they’ve began blaming us, saying extra individuals are working from house. I do not assume that is a legitimate excuse. They’ve had three years to kind that one out. I do not consider it. It appears to be a definite lack of funding.”
Mr McCracken, who lives in Mark Cross close to Tunbridge Wells, stated he wrote to South East Water’s boss accusing him of poor customer support and communication that may doom an organization in a aggressive market.
He stated: “The only reason he’s currently got any customers left is because he’s got a monopoly.
“And that is simply not ok, and there needs to be penalties. And Ofwat [the regulator] needs to be penalising them. They should not be allowed to take dividends or bonuses till they’ve sorted out the infrastructure issues.
“They should be taking the licences away from companies that don’t have minimum standards, the least they should be doing is saying there is no dividend.”
Read extra:
Water firm boss blames working from house for ban
Stop celebrating scorching climate, urges main environmentalist
Latest Sky News climate forecast to your space
South East Water CEO David Hinton apologised for latest shortages in an open letter on Friday and stated the corporate was striving to beat the issues.
He wrote: “The rise of working from home has increased drinking water demand in commuter towns by around 20% over a very short period, testing our existing infrastructure.
“The extreme lack of rainfall since April has elevated demand for handled consuming water.
“Our reservoir and aquifer stocks of raw water, essential to our water supply but not ready to be used, are in a good position. However, demand for treated mains water, which takes time to process, and deliver was greater than we could meet.”
He stated latest scorching climate had additionally elevated demand as folks tried to chill off, keep hydrated or are inclined to their gardens.
Among plans to enhance provide are new reservoirs and additional clear water storage services.
‘They by no means repair the leaks’
Matthew Spratt, who lives in Wadhurst, stated: “South East Water try in charge the area people for utilizing an excessive amount of water. And they’re principally saying it is our fault for working from house.
“I don’t accept that at all. I think what lies behind it is underinvestment.”
Mr Spratt, a expertise danger supervisor, stated folks had been scared by the considered waking up once more to no water.
“In the heat recently, we couldn’t wash, we couldn’t cook, we couldn’t flush our toilets.
“We had been having to lug bottled water from our water station, which the water firm solely offered as soon as they had been underneath stress from the parish council.
“If it’s sunshine, we don’t get water. If it’s a bit cold, we don’t get water.
“If they’re doing a bit of labor, we do not get water. And you may see in every single place there are many leaks. They by no means repair the leaks.
“I could walk you to a leak now that’s been there for two years that they’ve just not bothered to fix.”
He, too, stated the regulator Ofwat ought to deal with poor performing water firms extra harshly, moderately than merely fining them.
He stated: “I don’t know why they just fine them. I think the water company views it as a cost of doing business. I think they should lose their licence and it should be given to someone who could actually invest property at the moment.”
Source: information.sky.com”