It shall be awkward, to say the least, if Prince Harry comes nose to nose with Queen Camilla, or her loyal son Tom Parker Bowles, at King Charles III’s May 6 coronation after Harry portrayed his stepmother as one of many chief villains in his narrative about escaping royal life.
Parker Bowles has taken explicit problem with Harry’s declare that Camilla orchestrated “a campaign aimed at marriage and eventually the crown.” In a podcast interview this week, Parker Bowles, a meals author and meals critic, stated there was no “endgame” and that his mom married the then-Prince of Wales in 2005 out of affection.
“She married the person she loved and this is what happened,” Parker Bowles advised The News Agents podcast, hosted by Emily Maitlis and Jon Sopel.
“I don’t care what anyone says, this wasn’t some kind of endgame.”@tomparkerbowles talking completely to The News Agents about his mom, Camilla, changing into Queen.
Coming to @GlobalPlayer@maitlis | @jonsopel pic.twitter.com/9FVPXQhoxr
— The News Agents (@TheNewsAgents) April 20, 2023
Parker Bowles’ protection of Camilla comes after his stepbrother stated quite a lot of disparaging issues about her in his memoir “Spare” and in interviews to advertise the guide. The California-based Duke of Sussex alleged that Camilla “sacrificed” him to enhance her public picture, which was broken by revelations within the Nineteen Nineties that she and Charles began an affair whereas he was nonetheless married to the late Princess Diana.
Harry alleged that she leaked non-public info to the U.Okay. tabloids about him and his brother, Prince William. He additionally revealed that he and William, with whom he was as soon as shut, begged their father to not marry Camilla.
In “Spare,” Harry wrote that “The Other Woman” — as Harry known as Camilla — “began to play the long game,” after Charles stated he wished to marry her.
“Stories began to appear everywhere, in all the papers, about her private conversations with Willy, stories that contained pinpoint accurate details, none of which could have come from Willy,” Harry stated. “They could only have been leaked by the one other person present. And the leaking had obviously been abetted by the new spin doctor Camilla had talked Pa into hiring.”
In interviews to advertise his guide, Harry additionally branded his stepmother “the villain,” instructed she was “dangerous” and alleged that our bodies had been “left in the street” as she sought to rehabilitate her picture, The Telegraph reported.
Camilla has stated nothing publicly in response to Harry’s claims, abiding by the royal household’s coverage to not publicly touch upon criticism and detrimental information tales. But within the run-up to the coronation, it seems she has deputized folks near her to talk on her behalf. In addition to her son defending her within the podcast, a longtime good good friend advised the Sunday Times final week that Camilla had been “hurt” by issues Harry had stated.
Fiona Petty-Fitzmaurice, the Marchioness of Lansdowne, stated to the Times: “Of course it bothers her, of course it hurts. But she doesn’t let it get to her.”
“Her philosophy is always, ‘Don’t make a thing of it and it will settle down — least said, soonest mended,’” stated Petty-Fitzmaurice.
An unnamed royal aide advised the Times that the queen had mainly dismissed Harry’s feedback.
“It was not stamping of feet or gnashing of teeth, it was much more of an eye-roll response,” the aide stated.
Parker Bowles, the son of Camilla’s first husband, Andrew Parker Bowles, additionally praised his mom for taking over the job of being queen at her age. She’s anxious about how she’ll come throughout throughout the coronation, he stated.
“I think anyone would be anxious on an occasion of this sort of importance in terms of the historical,” Parker Bowles stated. “And sure, I feel I’d be terrified if I needed to type of stroll out carrying historical robes.
“She’s 75, but you know, it’s tough to do it,” Parker Bowles continued. “But she’s never complained. You just do it. Get on with it.”
Source: www.bostonherald.com”