Sam Bankman-Fried Trial seems at Federal Court in New York on Oct. 4th, 2023.
Artist: Claudia Johnson
Marc-Antoine Julliard usually trades cocoa beans. But within the spring of 2021, the London-based commodities dealer determined to diversify into cryptocurrency buying and selling. His platform of alternative was FTX.
Two years later, Julliard stood because the prosecution’s first witness within the prison fraud trial in opposition to FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried, who’s accused of misusing billions of {dollars} in shopper cash.
In testimony that lasted round 50 minutes on Wednesday, Julliard recounted his expertise with FTX, together with the “extremely anxious” feeling he had the day he unsuccessfully tried to withdraw a part of the $100,000 price of crypto and money he had saved on the location. He and 1000’s of different FTX prospects had been virtually worn out when the alternate went stomach up late final 12 months.
Like many others, Julliard mentioned he he was beneath the impression that there have been “strong financials behind the company.”
Julliard is the poster little one for the case the prosecution specified by its opening assertion because it tries to show to a jury that purchasers had been led to consider the cash they saved with FTX was protected. Prospective prospects, Julliard mentioned, had been drawn in by way of savvy advertising and marketing, with no motive to consider that FTX can be repurposing their crypto funds.
In a trial that is set to final six weeks, Bankman-Fried, a person as soon as revered because the “white knight” of crypto, faces seven federal expenses, together with wire fraud, securities fraud and cash laundering, that might put him in jail for the remainder of his life.
A jury was seated shortly after 11:30 a.m. (although 4 of the 12 jurors had been already trying to be dismissed). Opening statements started about an hour later. Julliard took the stand simply earlier than 2 p.m. to a packed courthouse in Manhattan.
As the lead witness, Julliard helped lay out the federal government’s narrative. Much of his determination to purchase into FTX needed to do with the celebrities and enterprise funds hooked up to the model. He referenced an advert with supermodel Gisele Bündchen and Formula 1 advertising and marketing. He additionally pointed to prolific media protection, which bolstered his belief within the firm.
Julliard wasn’t an aggressive crypto dealer. He mentioned he by no means participated in margin buying and selling, or borrowing cash to make purchases, nor did he have interaction in a lending program provided by the corporate that allowed customers to earn curiosity on idle crypto.
Sam Bankman-Fried sits together with his protection staff throughout his fraud trial over the collapse of FTX, the bankrupt cryptocurrency alternate, at Federal Court in New York City, U.S., October 4, 2023 on this courtroom sketch.
Jane Rosenberg | Reuters
Defense desires prospects to shoulder blame
The protection is attempting to make purchasers accountable for what it says had been their decisions to purchase and commerce crypto.
“Sam didn’t defraud anyone,” mentioned Mark Cohen, Bankman-Fried’s legal professional, in his opening assertion. Cohen referred to as it a “hindsight case” introduced by the federal government, and mentioned that simply because individuals misplaced cash, does not imply the 31-year-old Bankman-Fried dedicated fraud.
Bankman-Fried donned a contemporary go well with with a purple tie and a clear haircut — a a lot completely different look than the seaside shorts, sandals and wild curls that helped outline his picture throughout crypto’s heyday. The entrepreneur, who Cohen described as a “math nerd that didn’t drink or party,” diligently took notes on his air-gapped laptop computer as he conversed with each of his attorneys and, throughout breaks, typically stood whereas emphatically motioning together with his palms as he spoke to his counsel.
Throughout either side’ opening statements, Bankman-Fried stored his eyes skilled on the jury field. His head was turned 90 levels to his proper to observe those that will in the end resolve his destiny. Bankman-Fried was joined in courtroom by his mother and father, who’re each being sued by FTX’s new administration for having allegedly “exploited their access and influence within the FTX enterprise to enrich themselves…by millions of dollars.”
Cohen is projecting Bankman-Fried as a startup founder and equated working FTX and Alameda Research, his sister hedge fund, to “building a plane while flying on it.” He instructed the jury that there was no threat administration in place. Specifically, he mentioned the agency did not have a chief threat officer.
Far from the “cartoon of a villain” that the federal government offered, Cohen gave completely different explanations for his shopper’s supposedly unlawful actions. One instance handled the key backdoor baked into FTX’s code that prosecutors say gave Alameda a technique to borrow a lot wanted capital.
Cohen mentioned there was nothing secretive about this backchannel within the code base and mentioned the particular entry to FTX was there as a result of Alameda was initially arrange as a market maker for the crypto alternate, which wanted the liquidity, particularly in its early days.
Cohen reminded the jury that the three insiders who will take the stand in opposition to Bankman-Fried have all signed cooperation agreements with the federal government.
A $10 billion fraud
The prosecution’s opening assertion was delivered by Assistant U.S. Attorney Thane Rehn. Over the course of a few half hour, Rehn drove house the purpose that on a regular basis buyers had been those who fell sufferer to FTX’s scheme. By the summer time of 2022, he mentioned, greater than $10 billion had been stolen from 1000’s of FTX prospects who had trusted custody of their crypto and money to the platform.
Rehn mentioned the proof would present jurors how Bankman-Fried lied to FTX customers, buyers and lenders, and the way he spent a very good quantity of the cash he stole for his personal good. Rehn referenced marketing campaign contributions, for instance, as a method that Bankman-Fried regarded to curry favor on Capitol Hill.
Rehn referred to as Alameda a “second, smaller and more secretive company” based and managed by Bankman-Fried that was integral to the defendant’s alleged scheme.
The authorities additionally teed up its star witness, ex-girlfriend and Alameda’s ex-CEO, Caroline Ellison. She pleaded responsible in December to a number of expenses and has been cooperating with the U.S. legal professional’s workplace in Manhattan for months.
Rehn plans to point out that Bankman-Fried put in his girlfriend on the prime of his hedge fund, although he remained the one calling the pictures behind the scenes.
Allan Joseph Bankman, father of FTX Co-Founder Sam Bankman-Fried, and Barbara Fried, mom of FTX Co-Founder Sam Bankman-Fried, arrive at courtroom in New York, US, on Wednesday, Oct. 4, 2023.
Stephanie Keith | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Noticeably absent was the point out of Ellison’s co-CEO Sam Trabucco, who was a classmate of Bankman-Fried at MIT. Trabucco left FTX in Aug. 2022, and has stayed comparatively beneath the radar.
Also central to the federal government’s case is the alleged coverup to cover Bankman-Fried’s crimes. Those techniques embrace backdating contracts and utilizing encrypted messaging apps set to auto-delete to keep away from a paper path.
“This man stole billions of dollars from thousands of people,” Rein mentioned, as he closed his assertion.
The prosecution’s second witness was Adam Yedidia, who met Bankman-Fried in faculty on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The pair remained good pals.
Yedida detailed his expertise working first as a dealer at Alameda for 2 months in 2017, and later as a software program engineer for FTX starting in January 2021. He mentioned he resigned from FTX the day earlier than the alternate filed for chapter after a fellow developer instructed him that Alameda had used FTX buyer deposits to pay again collectors.
Speaking rapidly and intentionally with an air of practiced nonchalance, Yedida testified that he hadn’t talked to Bankman-Fried or seen him in particular person since Nov. 2022.
When requested why he was showing beneath an immunity order, Yedida mentioned he was involved that as an FTX developer, he “may have unwittingly written code that contributed to a crime.”
Prosecutors bought by way of a half hour of testimony earlier than breaking for the day. The authorities will proceed its questioning of Yedida at 9:30 A.M. on Thursday.
FTX co-founder Gary Wang may also be taking the stand this week for the federal government.
WATCH: Sam Bankman-Fried prison trial begins in New York
Source: www.cnbc.com”