Artificial Intelligence may have important impacts on geopolitics and globalization, Ian Bremmer advised CNBC.
Leigh Vogel | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images
Artificial Intelligence may have a big impression on each geopolitics and globalization, in keeping with Ian Bremmer, political scientist and president of the Eurasia Group.
“I think that AI is transformative for the geopolitical order, both in good ways and in problematic ways,” Bremmer advised CNBC’s Tania Bryer for “The CNBC Conversation.”
On the plus aspect, AI may drive “a new globalization,” Bremmer mentioned — at a time when questions concerning the state and way forward for globalization abound. The new expertise may see the creation and growth of a brand new international center class get a lift, he added.
“Anyone with a smartphone will have access to it,” Bremmer defined, including that he believes this can improve human capital world wide. Areas like drugs and training might be strengthened, whereas industrial and scientific processes will change into extra environment friendly, he urged.
“In other words, I’m an enthusiast about what this technology will do for the world,” Bremmer mentioned.
However, he additionally pointed to dangers that would result in destructive disruption — and warned that the world isn’t but ready for this. For instance, anybody can use AI to jot down code, but it surely may also be used to hack into programs or create malware, Bremmer identified. Similarly, it could be used to develop vaccines — but additionally viruses — he added.
“That means that the governance that occurs is going to have to be not just about governments, but the technology companies too. We’re not ready for that, but that’s the reality,” Bremmer mentioned.
Policymakers catching up
Global leaders and policymakers will not be prepared but, Bremmer advised CNBC, however they’re catching up.
“A year ago, I can’t think of a single conversation I had with a global leader, anywhere in the world, where they were asking about AI — where they were fundamentally concerned about the implications of AI for their political systems, for the global economy, for national security,” he mentioned.
“Today, I can barely think of a single global leader that doesn’t ask me about it.”
This consists of international locations world wide corresponding to China, the U.S. and U.Ok., in addition to worldwide organizations just like the European Union and G7, Bremmer defined. While studying about AI, they’re assessing what they do and do not know, in addition to the position expertise firms play, he mentioned.
Since the AI growth started on the finish of 2022, international locations have been racing to grasp and regulate the expertise. It’s proved a big problem for lawmakers as a result of extremely quick development of AI within the public area, and the various challenges it may deliver — from job safety to nationwide safety.
In June, EU lawmakers handed rules that might require new AI instruments, corresponding to chatbots, to be reviewed earlier than being launched to the broader inhabitants, and ban parts of the expertise corresponding to real-time face recognition.
Elsewhere, China introduced guidelines for generative AI providers like OpenAI’s viral ChatGPT in July, stating that licenses could also be required earlier than such AI instruments might be made publicly out there.
Steps to AI regulation
But for AI to be correctly regulated, a better understanding of it must be established, Bremmer advised CNBC.
“You can’t govern it until you know what it is,” he mentioned.
“We need a United Nations-driven process, an intergovernmental panel on artificial intelligence, with the governments, the scientists, the companies together to understand the basic state of play of what AI can do, who the principal actors are, what the opportunities are, what the dangers are.”
For Bremmer, it is essential that international locations and different actors work collectively on this discipline — relatively than compete with one another.
“It’s not like nukes, where you have a few countries that have them and you stop everyone else from getting it,” he mentioned. Instead, the decentralized, open-source nature of AI implies that anybody will have the ability to entry the most recent developments and use them for both good or unhealthy.
Global oversight is subsequently key, Bremmer mentioned, suggesting a “geo-technology stability board” as one attainable resolution. This would see international locations and tech firms work collectively to “try to ensure that we don’t regulate people out of existence, but we have the ability to respond to ensure that the market of AI globally continues to function.”
“It cannot be the U.S. versus China,” Bremmer concluded.
Some international locations have already indicated they might be open to collaborating on AI regulation, or at the very least partaking with friends on the subject. Top French politicians, for instance, mentioned they might work with the U.S. on legal guidelines across the expertise.
Source: www.cnbc.com”