Bounced State Street govt Ivan Cheung, 42, was charged this week with raping two kids and two grownup ladies at knifepoint in 4 separate incidents between 2003 and 2006. Dedication and good investigative work from Boston Police led to his seize when DNA checks tied him to 2 of the crimes.
The spineless alleged predator hid from the general public at his arraignment, though with social media, the man’s image is already in all places. At his subsequent look on Sept. 22, Cheung ought to be pressured to indicate his face as a result of the general public has a proper and a must see the man as he feels the sting of public disgrace. Until his face is proven, we might not know the reality about what number of ladies and women had been victimized throughout his suspected reign of terror.
One of Cheung’s alleged victims deserves particular consideration, although she just isn’t one of many 4 within the circumstances filed this week.
Cheung was charged with raping a Boston University scholar at 4 a.m. in November 2003, however the costs had been shortly dropped. The public has a proper to know why as a result of Cheung allegedly raped two extra ladies in 2005 and 2006, however the Suffolk District Attorney has supplied no rationalization.
Silence, slightly than a full rationalization, leads cheap individuals to conclude that one thing fishy occurred. The Boston University Police and Boston Police each have reviews, and the DA’s workplace has a file. Someone wants to clarify why he was allowed to stroll free.
The Boston University case is the one one which came about at a university, and faculties are infamous for stopping campus rapes from making their option to the legal justice system, even at the moment.
Boston University’s status was horrendous again in ’03 as a result of victims had been typically threatened with sanctions in the event that they reported consuming alcohol on the time of the rape. Other colleges had amnesty insurance policies that prevented victims from getting in hassle for consuming in the event that they had been intoxicated once they had been raped.
Advocates complained that victims had been declining to report rape for concern of being suspended or kicked off campus, and rapists had been exploiting the state of affairs by concentrating on victims who had been consuming, however Boston University continued to make use of the coverage.
The 2003 Boston University sufferer has a proper to justice. Regardless of why her case was dismissed, Cheung now faces costs involving 4 different victims. Why is her case not included? Have police and prosecutors reached out to her? If her case was dismissed as a result of she was afraid Boston University would punish her for consuming, it’s time to reverse that call and do the fitting factor.
Police say Cheung used a knife to forcibly rape the younger girl, similar to he did with the others. Someone must name the sufferer and apologize. The prosecutor ought to have the ethical integrity to make sure that all Cheung’s alleged victims have their day in courtroom.
Along with a proof for why the Boston University case was dropped, the District Attorney ought to clarify why proof from the BU case was not matched to proof from the alleged rapes of two kids earlier in ’03.
According to information reviews, there was no DNA from the youngsters’s circumstances, however police had details about his automotive, and so they knew he was accused of attacking the Boston University scholar in his automotive, too. Why was no connection made? If the circumstances had been associated, possibly the Boston University costs wouldn’t have been dropped and Cheung would have been in jail slightly than out on the streets the place he was free to allegedly rape many times.
As the Supreme Court mentioned a few years in the past, rape is probably the most severe crime that may occur to an individual, wanting murder. So why was the rape of a Boston University scholar handled like shoplifting? Women in Massachusetts — particularly Cheung’s victims from ’05 and ’06 — actually need to know.
Wendy Murphy is a lawyer and victims’ rights advocate.
Source: www.bostonherald.com”