The lawyer for Monica Cannon-Grant has filed a movement to withdraw from her federal fraud case.
“Now comes the undersigned counsel and hereby moves to withdraw his appearance as counsel for the Defendant, Monica Cannon-Grant,” legal professional Robert Goldstein wrote within the two-sentence movement. “Counsel understands that Ms. Cannon-Grant will seek court-appointed counsel in this matter.”
In addition to that, the doc filed Wednesday said, “The government has no objection to the request to withdraw as counsel.” Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein should rule on the order.
Cannon-Grant and her husband, Clark Grant — who has been represented by a federal public defender, Julie-Ann Olson, all through the case — had been federally indicted in March on 18 fraud-related costs within the administration of their charity, Violence in Boston.
The indictment was unsealed March 15, which is identical day Goldstein appeared on the case docket as Cannon-Grant’s legal professional. Goldstein is a retained legal professional, not a public defender.
Prosecutors say that the couple used funds donated or granted to the charity for their very own ends, together with funding private means, automobile funds and nail-salon appointments.
That is the primary of three distinct parts charged within the indictment, prosecutor Dustin Chao mentioned on the final in-person listening to within the case on June 10. The second is the misuse of public funds, together with the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program, which the federal government mentioned the couple utilized for and acquired regardless of Grant being employed full-time, based on Chao. The third tentpole allegation is fraud associated to the mortgage on the couple’s Taunton residence.
Goldstein had no touch upon the matter when contacted by the Herald Wednesday. A Herald request for remark forwarded by Goldstein to Cannon-Grant for a earlier story has not been returned, and a brand new request for remark forwarded Wednesday was not instantly returned.
Cannon-Grant acquired permission to use for unemployment help — a program she is accused of defrauding — on Aug. 18.
Federal public defender workplaces, of which there are actually 81 throughout the federal courts system, had been arrange “as counterparts to federal prosecutors in U.S. Attorneys Offices and an institutional resource for providing defense counsel in those districts,” based on U.S. Courts. Federal public defenders, like their prosecutor counterparts, are paid a wage.
An different to a federal public defender is a Criminal Justice Act panel legal professional, which is a non-public legal professional who is on the market to tackle federal protection circumstances on the courtroom’s dime. Those panel attorneys can obtain $148 per hour in non-capital circumstances like this one.
Source: www.bostonherald.com”