NEW YORK — A Manhattan decide on Monday dismissed Donald Trump’s counterclaim towards E. Jean Carroll, alleging she defamed him as a rapist after a jury discovered him answerable for sexual abuse.
The determination by Judge Lewis Kaplan discovered that the distinction between Carroll’s allegedly defamatory remarks — that Trump “raped” her as outlined beneath New York regulation — and the jury’s discovering that he forcibly digitally penetrated her was “minimal.”
“The difference between Ms. Carroll’s allegedly defamatory statements — that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as defined in the New York Penal Law — and the ‘truth’ — that Mr. Trump forcibly digitally penetrated Ms. Carroll — is minimal. Both are felonious sex crimes,” Kaplan wrote.
“If Ms. Carroll had stated that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her by forcibly digitally penetrating her vagina instead of referring also (allegedly) to forcible penile penetration, there would have been no different effect on the mind of an average listener.”
A jury on May 9 discovered Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll in a Midtown altering room within the mid-Nineteen Nineties and defaming her final 12 months as a liar on Truth Social. Trump filed a defamation counterclaim towards Carroll in June for persevering with to make use of the time period “rape” after the decision.
Jurors had a number of avenues of discovering Trump answerable for the battery declare — with choices to decide on rape, sexual abuse, and different offenses — finally discovering her legal professionals didn’t present sufficient proof to indicate he penetrated her along with his penis. They believed the proof confirmed he did sexually abuse her.
In one other blow, Kaplan struck down Trump’s presidential immunity protection in Carroll’s excellent 2019 lawsuit, which the decide beforehand stated was inadequate and that Trump hadn’t raised it in time.
Carroll’s first swimsuit — which alleges Trump defamed her whereas in workplace — was stalled for years as he and the Justice Department argued that he couldn’t be sued for something he stated whereas president. The DOJ not too long ago backed down from that argument. Had it succeeded, it might have taken Trump’s place within the case.
The decide stated Trump bringing it up once more in amended papers made no distinction.
“There is nothing new in the amended complaint that would make Mr. Trump’s presidential immunity defense any more viable or persuasive now than it would have been before,” Kaplan wrote.
“The opportunity to answer an amended complaint is not a free pass to correct past wrongs without any justification or basis for doing so.”
Trump’s legal professionals didn’t instantly reply to requests for remark.
“E Jean Carroll looks forward to receiving the $5 million in damages that the jury awarded her in Carroll II,” Carroll’s lawyer Robbie Kaplan stated.
“She also looks forward to continuing to hold Trump accountable for what he did to her at the trial in Carroll I, which is scheduled to begin on Jan. 15, 2024.”
____
©2023 New York Daily News. Visit at nydailynews.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Source: www.bostonherald.com”