By JOSEF FEDERMAN and SAMY MAGDY (Associated Press)
JERUSALEM (AP) — The United States has supplied sturdy assist to Israel in its battle towards Hamas, which guidelines the Gaza Strip. But the allies are more and more at odds over what is going to occur to Gaza as soon as the battle winds down.
Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, this week introduced that Israel would retain an open-ended safety presence in Gaza. Israeli officers discuss of imposing a buffer zone to maintain Palestinians away from the Israeli border. They rule out any function for the Palestinian Authority, which was ousted from Gaza by Hamas in 2007 however governs semi-autonomous areas of the occupied West Bank. Hamas has been designated as a terrorist group by the United States, Canada and the European Union.
The United States has laid out a a lot completely different imaginative and prescient. Top officers have stated they won’t enable Israel to reoccupy Gaza or additional shrink its already small territory. They have repeatedly referred to as for a return of the internationally acknowledged Palestinian Authority and the resumption of peace talks aimed toward establishing a Palestinian state alongside Israel.
These conflicting visions have set the stage for troublesome discussions between Israel and the U.S.
Here’s a more in-depth take a look at the problems.
SHAKY COMMON GROUND
Israel declared battle on Hamas after the Islamic group burst throughout its southern border on Oct. 7, slaughtering some 1,200 folks, largely civilians, and kidnapping greater than 240 others. President Joe Biden rapidly flew to Israel on a solidarity mission, and his administration has strongly backed Israel’s proper to defend itself whereas offering weapons and army help.
Israel has stated its aim is to destroy Hamas —- a troublesome process given the group’s deep roots in Palestinian society.
The U.S., which together with different Western international locations considers Hamas a terrorist group, has embraced this aim. But because the battle drags on, it has expressed misgivings in regards to the dire humanitarian situations and mounting civilian dying toll in Gaza, the place well being authorities report over 16,000 useless, no less than two-thirds of them ladies and youngsters. Israel says Hamas is responsible by utilizing civilians as human shields.
Over the weekend, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin stated it’s crucial that Israel shield Gaza’s civilians.
“If you drive them into the arms of the enemy, you replace a tactical victory with a strategic defeat,” he stated. “So I have repeatedly made clear to Israel’s leaders that protecting civilians in Gaza is both a moral responsibility and a strategic imperative.”
On Thursday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken went even farther, telling Israel that “civilian casualties remain too high and that Israel must step up its efforts to reduce them,” his workplace stated. Blinken additionally referred to as on Israel to extend the movement of humanitarian support into Gaza.
DIFFERENT VISIONS
The greatest variations between the allies have emerged over the longer-term imaginative and prescient for Gaza.
Netanyahu has supplied solely glimpses of what he plans.
On Tuesday, he stated the army would retain open-ended safety management over the Gaza Strip lengthy after the battle ends, suggesting a type of prolonged Israeli occupation.
Netanyahu dominated out the thought of international peacekeepers, saying solely the Israeli military may be sure that Gaza stays demilitarized. Netanyahu has additionally rejected a return of the Palestinian Authority, saying its chief, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas can’t be trusted.
“After destroying Hamas, Gaza will be demilitarized and de-radicalized so that no threat will be posed to Israel from Gaza,” stated Ophir Falk, an adviser to Netanyahu. “The buffer zone may be part of the demilitarization. That’s the plan.”
Israel informed Western allies and regional neighbors in regards to the buffer zone plans as not too long ago as final week, with out providing an in depth proposal, in keeping with Egyptians officers and Arab and Western diplomats, who insisted on anonymity to debate the subject.
The officers stated international locations knowledgeable of the proposal embrace Egypt, Qatar, Jordan, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia. Two Egyptian officers stated it seems that Israel doesn’t have an in depth workable plan for such a zone, together with its width.
“They just say, ‘it would be a temporary buffer zone,’” one of many officers stated. “But when we asked for details, they don’t have answers.”
While no choices have been taken, these concepts seem to place Israel at odds with the White House.
Biden and different prime officers have repeatedly stated {that a} “revitalized” Palestinian Authority should play a job in postwar Gaza and that Israel should search a two-state resolution involving the PA. They have dominated out a long-term re-occupation or redrawing of Gaza’s borders.
Vice President Kamala Harris laid out maybe the clearest U.S. imaginative and prescient throughout an handle in Dubai final weekend.
“Five principles guide our approach for post-conflict Gaza: no forcible displacement, no re-occupation, no siege or blockade, no reduction in territory, and no use of Gaza as a platform for terrorism,” she stated. “We want to see a unified Gaza and West Bank under the Palestinian Authority, and Palestinian voices and aspirations must be at the center of this work.”
Frustration with Netanyahu will not be restricted to the U.S.
Amos Harel, the army affairs columnist for the Haaretz every day, stated Israeli military commanders consider Netanyahu is motivated by home political concerns and refusing to cope with the Palestinian Authority “due to coalition constructions from his far-right partners.” Netanyahu and his hardline coalition companions oppose Palestinian independence.
HOW SERIOUS ARE THE DISPUTES?
For now, either side appear to be centered on the shared aim of destroying Hamas.
“It’s important for them that Israel achieve the military goals because this is the starting point for any changes that can happen the day after,” stated Eldad Shavit, a former high-ranking Israeli intelligence official.
He stated U.S. strain within the quick time period will probably be on instant points — similar to strain to reduce civilian casualties and to permit extra deliveries of humanitarian support.
The U.S. has indicated that it’ll present some persistence after the preventing subsides.
State Department spokesman Matthew Miller stated the U.S. understands “there will have to be some kind of transition period after the end of major combat operations.” He declined to say how lengthy that will take.
But because the dying toll in Gaza continues to rise, situations deteriorate, and Biden enters an election yr with important parts of his Democratic base pushing for an finish to Israel’s offensive, these variations are more likely to develop within the absence of a transparent endgame.
Shavit stated that tensions may rise if the U.S. in some unspecified time in the future concludes that Israel is dragging its toes or ignoring American calls for. But for now, “the Americans want Israel to succeed,” he stated.
Daniel Levy, a former Israeli peace negotiator who’s president of the U.S./Middle East Project, a coverage institute that research the Israeli-Palestinian battle, stated the Americans are unlikely to place their foot down.
He cited what he described as a tepid American response to heavy civilian casualties in southern Gaza as an indicator of what lies forward.
“Israelis have a sense that their road to run is not endless, but they still feel they have lots of road to run,” he stated.
___
Magdy reported from Cairo.
Source: www.bostonherald.com”