Yes, there are extra maps.
Boston City Councilor Liz Breadon, the redistricting chair, has filed a committee report that makes scant few modifications to the controversial “unity” map that she, City Councilor Ricardo Arroyo and various advocates collaborated to supply as the method strikes towards a vote this Wednesday.
Breadon, as chair, has the power to amend gadgets earlier than her committee by means of these experiences, which then go up for a vote earlier than the complete 13-member physique, at which level others can suggest amendments.
Breadon’s newest providing largely retains the map the identical, transferring a public-housing-heavy chunk of South Boston from District 2 into District 3 and a swath of southern Dorchester from D3 into District 4.
“The new draft reflects several changes discussed at Committee working sessions and testimony received at public hearings, as well as population requirements, measuring the effectiveness for voters to elect their candidate of choice, while balancing priorities to maintain neighborhoods and communities of interest where possible,” Breadon, who couldn’t be reached for additional touch upon Monday, wrote within the committee report made public that day forward of the Wednesday vote she’s looking for.
The map was instantly panned by the councilors who’ve already taken difficulty with it, notably City Council President Ed Flynn of D2, who desires to maintain these components of Southie, and City Councilor Frank Baker of D3, who desires to maintain these southern Cedar Grove/Neponset/Adams Village parts of Dot along with his district.
Flynn, calling the method “reckless” as he continues to escalate his opposition, stated, “Dividing public housing residents in South Boston and dividing communities of color is immoral and unconscionable.”
Redistricting Vice Chair Brian Worrell, the town councilor from D4, has had questions on what the Breadon-Arroyo-advocates map would do to his district, however his workplace didn’t reply to a request for remark.
Baker stated that the method is “cutting communities of interest up. There’s no mandate to go in and break up communities of interest.”
In Southie and Dorchester, teams of civic organizations have coalesced to push again on the present map. In Baker’s district, a cadre of neighborhood teams is submitting data requests each of Breadon’s workplace and the council as a complete for communications round redistricting and the creation of the Breadon-Arroyo map. Up in Southie, totally different organizations have filed an open-meeting grievance that led to the council scuttling a vote on this final week.
“Our concerns are that the process has not been sufficiently public,” lawyer John Lyons of the Port Norfolk Civic Association in Dorchester advised the Herald of the data requests.
And this isn’t the final map — At-Large City Councilor Michael Flaherty submitted his personal model on Monday, bringing the entire as much as six, if the unique Breadon-Arroyo map is taken into account the identical because the amended model within the committee report.
Flaherty, apparently taking part in off of the “unity” moniker Arroyo and Breadon gave their map, known as his the “neighborhood unity” map. It would shuffle round parts of a number of districts, seeking to put the borders on neighborhood traces.
“We also need to be ever mindful of the required criteria, which seems to have been lost in this process, particularly as it pertains to protecting historic neighborhood boundaries,” Flaherty stated, calling, as Flynn and Baker have, for holding off on a vote this week.
Source: www.bostonherald.com”