The Ricardo Arroyo district legal professional marketing campaign claims vindication after releasing paperwork that state that police decided that “there was no crime committed” to shut out the 2005 investigation into the now-DA candidate.
For the file: Arroyo marketing campaign paperwork
The marketing campaign wrote in a press launch that “this new information confirms what Ricardo Arroyo has been saying all along – he has never sexually assaulted anyone.” The redacted paperwork additionally included a few completely different situations of authorities writing that the case was decided to be “unfounded.”
This comes after a decide on Thursday sided with Arroyo in requiring the town on Friday at hand over almost the total file — with redactions to guard the accuser — of the 2005 investigation right into a declare of sexual misconduct towards the teenage Arroyo.
The Arroyo marketing campaign, although, wouldn’t put out greater than the 4 pages that again up its conclusion.
That mentioned, the marketing campaign precisely notes that one e-mail from a prosecutor says they’d referred to as the girl who filed the grievance that “based on the assessment of the information we had, there was no crime committed.” The case, in line with the paperwork, was deemed “unfounded.”
Mayor Michelle Wu’s press workplace continued all through the afternoon to tug its ft in releasing the now-public full file, which it handed over to the Arroyo camp hours earlier on the behest of the courts. The metropolis insisted they’d be prepared to provide out “soon,” however wouldn’t touch upon what else the town could possibly be doing to the already-redacted public paperwork.
An hour earlier than the two p.m. deadline for the town to provide over the file, Arroyo’s opponent, sitting DA Kevin Hayden, had his workplace blast out a press launch slamming Arroyo, who’s at the moment a metropolis councilor.
“We have thoroughly reviewed our entire unredacted file regarding the sexual assault allegations against Ricardo Arroyo,” a Suffolk DA spokeswoman mentioned. “Nothing in the file suggests or indicates that the allegations were unfounded. Also, nothing in the file questions the validity of the victim’s statements. The campaign to sabotage this victim’s credibility is shameful.”
Arroyo’s marketing campaign, in its assertion, identified that this isn’t true because it once more tried to put the leaks of those usually protected paperwork at Hayden’s ft.
“In addition, this document clearly shows that Kevin Hayden’s comments today about the case file were lies,” Arroyo’s marketing campaign mentioned. “His review and comments on the file were also likely illegal and unethical.”
Among the court docket filings in Arroyo’s case, although, was a distinct story. The accuser’s lawyer had proven up in court docket Thursday to push towards the discharge of the paperwork, saying that will “destroy” the younger girl.
In an affidavit, the lawyer, Leonard Kesten, wrote, “Jane Doe was I7 years old when she was sexually abused by the Plaintiff, Ricardo Arroyo.”
Source: www.bostonherald.com”