The lawyer pitched the AI software program as a free resolution for these struggling to afford legislation providers.
A lawyer simply defined in a Twitter thread a case whereby ChatGPT can be utilized instead as a substitute of hiring an lawyer like him.
Eric Pacifici, who goes by SMBAcquisitionAttorney on Twitter, posted a 19-tweet thread which he referred to as “Things ChatGPT can do right now that (maybe) you no longer need to pay lawyers for.” The co-founder of SMB Law Group mentioned it’s simply the primary a part of a collection he hopes to proceed.
His preliminary thread centered on “Researching and analyzing simple legal business disputes.” He highlighted one case which centered on a dispute between the proprietor of a storage unit and a tenant who’s behind on lease.
Pacifici defined that the one choices up to now for anybody on this state of affairs can be to name a lawyer or analysis for an answer on-line. But ChatGPT now permits them to search out pretty correct solutions to the issue, at the least when fed the best info.
Pacifici supplied a four-step template to assist body the immediate to feed ChatGPT. These are defining the difficulty, stating info or background info, highlighting the foundations relative to the placement, and defining the target.
DON’T MISS: ChatGPT: Students Battle Over Using AI to Cheat in College
He additionally defined that any extra steps — like correctly engaging in the framework or making a written discover, which was a part of the answer supplied by ChatGPT to the case — can conveniently be achieved by asking the AI software program as properly.
Pacifici famous that the solutions aren’t excellent. He acknowledged that ChatGPT typically gave some inaccurate info, and that the options supplied by this system have been “a little light on the technical legal requirements.” But he nonetheless believes it’s essential to focus on this as a free resolution to those that can’t afford attorneys or for circumstances the place paying for a lawyer can be counterintuitive.
“Equitable access to legal services is a problem, especially for people of low-socioeconomic status,” Pacifici wrote to shut his thread. “This information is being offered in an effort to educate and empower readers to make informed decisions about their legal matters but is not a substitute for actual legal representation.”
Source: www.thestreet.com”