The fertiliser subsidy is prone to contact an all-time excessive of Rs 1.65 lakh crore this monetary 12 months towards the finances estimate of Rs 1.05 lakh crore as a result of an unprecedented rise in the price of uncooked supplies and fertilisers globally, in keeping with a report.
India’s fertiliser subsidy is about to the touch a document of Rs 1.65 lakh crore and an extra subsidy and revision within the nutrient-based subsidy (NBS) charges are essential with a purpose to maintain the credit score profiles of fertiliser makers, Crisil stated in a report.
“Our assessment assumes 3 per cent year-on-year growth in demand for fertilisers and a moderation of raw material and fertiliser prices in the second half of this fiscal. If demand is higher than expected, or input prices do not soften even in the second half, the subsidy bill may inch up to Rs 1.8-1.9 lakh crore,” the report added.
According to the report, prior to now two fiscals, the federal government has paid an extra Rs 1.2 lakh crore and elevated the budgeted subsidy.
However, the steep rise in uncooked materials costs has been negating this and one other intervention could also be wanted in 2022-23, the Crisil report famous.
“Over 85 per cent of the subsidy arrears could be contributed by urea. This is because pooled gas prices – a blend of domestic gas and imported LNG considered for billing to fertilisers plants – had shot up more than 75 per cent last fiscal, and is expected to remain elevated for most part of 2022-23, because of the Russia-Ukraine conflict,” Crisil Ratings director Nitesh Jain stated.
At the identical time, retail costs of urea have stayed put, rising the federal government’s subsidy burden, he famous.
“This would be despite some respite likely from the commissioning of new domestic capacities that could potentially halve India’s import dependence for urea from nearly 28 per cent in fiscal 2021,” he added.
The retail promoting worth (RSP) of urea is fastened by the federal government, the report defined.
To spur farmers to make use of fertilisers for higher crop yield, the federal government retains the RSP considerably decrease than the market price, and reimburses the urea makers via subsidy funds, it stated.
While this protects the profitability of urea makers to a big extent, the RSP remaining unchanged regardless of rising prices will imply the federal government should foot an even bigger subsidy invoice, it added.
Likewise, costs of phosphoric acid and rock phosphate – elements for non-urea fertilisers – have additionally gone up by 92 per cent and 99 per cent, respectively, prior to now 12 months via March 2022.
Further, provided that Russia, Belarus and Ukraine are the key suppliers of non-urea fertiliser elements, the continuing battle will solely exacerbate the scenario, it said. While non-urea makers have hiked costs, it might not be enough to cowl the escalation in price, Crisil stated.
For non-urea fertiliser makers, the federal government pays subsidy as per the nutrient-based subsidy (NBS) charges, that are but to be introduced for this fiscal.
In this backdrop, the credit score profiles of fertiliser makers will rely upon components like further subsidy outlay, primarily for urea makers, and revision of NBS charges for non-urea makers.
Any delay in, or inadequacy of, subsidy funds can have a bearing on the money flows of fertiliser makers, and result in greater working capital wants, the report added.
Source: www.financialexpress.com”