St Stephen’s College is at the moment locked in an deadlock with Delhi University over the faculty’s refusal to scrap interviews for admissions to common seats. The varsity has insisted that admissions to those seats needs to be finished via Central Universities Entrance Test (CUET) scores solely and knowledgeable the faculty that any admission that violated its guidelines could be voided.
ST STEPHEN’S COLLEGE ADMISSION PROCESS
St Stephen’s College insists on sustaining a 15% weightage to interviews for admissions for all classes. It is amongst a minority of Delhi University faculties that also reserves 50% seats for minority college students. The college administration has directed these faculties to conduct the admission course of for common seats on the premise of CUET.
St Stephen’s can also be the one Delhi University school that has traditionally supplemented the cut-off filter with an interview course of to pick out college students.
In its prospectus for admissions to the 2022-2023 educational session, the faculty stated CUET would have 85% weightage and 15% weightage could be given to interviews for candidates shortlisted on the premise of CUET. The school additionally requires candidates to register by itself portal, other than the widespread Delhi University portal. Following the adoption of CUET, candidates should register on a National Testing Agency portal (as a substitute of the college portal) and choose Delhi University as one in every of their selections, and apply to St Stephen’s College on their official web site.
The school stated within the prospectus that the ratio wherein common college students could be known as for the interview spherical would roughly be six candidates to each Humanities seat and eight candidates to each Science seat. The 2018-2019 prospectus had talked about a ratio of roughly 1:4 for Humanities and 1:6 for Science.
The St Stephen’s College interview spherical has three parts — educational to look at “suitability for the subject chosen beyond what is indicated by marks alone”; co-curricular to find out “the potential to participate in the co-curricular activities of the college and to contribute to its total life”; common consciousness and values to look at “a candidate’s personal outlook, sense of values, level of awareness and motivation”.
Following the interviews, the faculty publishes a listing of candidates chosen and a ready checklist.
RATIONALE BEHIND ST STEPHEN’S COLLEGE INTERVIEWS
In 1980, the Supreme Court deliberated on the faculty’s minority standing, the interview course of, and if it was allowed to put aside seats for Christians. The apex courtroom issued a judgment in 1991. During the hearings, the faculty submitted that it had performed interviews since inception.
The provision for the interview is an integral a part of the faculty administration, it stated, including that it was a part of its managerial perform that might not be taken away by the varsity.
In its judgment, the highest courtroom stated there was neither any arbitrariness nor vice or lack of scientific foundation within the interview and that the faculty appeared to have “compelling reasons” to comply with its personal admission programme.
OPPOSITION TO ST STEPHEN’S INTERVIEWS
The 1991 Supreme Court judgment was issued with a 4:1 majority. The minority view of Justice M Kasliwal critiqued the interview course of. The methodology can’t be thought of so sacrosanct that it can’t be annulled or modified when such strategies are usually not authorized by Delhi University, Justice Kasliwal had stated.
On the interview of Christian candidates, three academics challenged in Delhi High Court the appointment of a member nominated by the Supreme Council of the faculty to be a part of the panel interviewing Christian college students. The excessive courtroom had refused to intervene within the matter.
Source: www.financialexpress.com”