Reaction to a leaked Supreme Court determination that declares the 1973 Roe v. Wade determination that legalized abortion, “egregiously wrong from the start,” earned swift condemnation from members of the Massachusetts Congressional delegation.
“If true, this is a disgrace,” mentioned Rep. Jim McGovern in a tweet, “The backwards, dystopian GOP wants to put politicians in charge of whether or not you can get an abortion.”
🚨 Important to maintain repeating:
Abortion remains to be authorized, in Massachusetts & in all places else. It remains to be a proper. This is an unconfirmed draft opinion.
If true, we are going to set up & mobilize, legislate & inspire.
Everyone should perceive the implications of this determination.
— Rep. Jim McGovern (@RepMcGovern) May 3, 2022
“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” the draft opinion obtained by Politico states. It was signed by Justice Samuel Alito, a member of the court docket’s 6-3 conservative majority who was appointed by former President George W. Bush.
The doc was labeled a “1st Draft” of the “Opinion of the Court” in a case difficult Mississippi’s ban on abortion after 15 weeks, a case often known as Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
“If tonight’s reports are true, American women are on the brink of losing a fundamental right to make crucial healthcare decisions for themselves,” mentioned Rep. Seth Moulton. “This decision would take women’s rights back 50 years and put millions in danger by bringing back unsafe back-alley #abortions.”
Decisions like this are the results of a politicized Supreme Court that places ideology forward of our constitutional rights. Rest assured, we are going to work to appropriate this injustice whether it is carried out.
— Seth Moulton (@sethmoulton) May 3, 2022
Rep. Lori Trahan mentioned if the opinion turns into remaining, “tens of millions of women will lose access to lifesaving reproductive care. Many won’t be able to access abortion care if they’re the victims of rape or incest. The fight is on. We need the Women’s Health Protection Act. We need it NOW!”
If this opinion is formally launched, tens of hundreds of thousands of girls will lose entry to lifesaving reproductive care. Many received’t have the ability to entry abortion care in the event that they’re the victims of rape or incest.
The battle is on. We want the Women’s Health Protection Act. We want it NOW! https://t.co/bkiI8ECDzP
— Congresswoman Lori Trahan (@RepLoriTrahan) May 3, 2022
Senator Elizabeth Warren blasted what she referred to as an “extremist Supreme Court,” able to, “impose its far-right, unpopular views on the entire country. It’s time for the millions who support the Constitution and abortion rights to stand up and make their voices heard. We’re not going back—not ever.”
An extremist Supreme Court is poised to overturn #RoeVWade and impose its far-right, unpopular views on the whole nation. It’s time for the hundreds of thousands who help the Constitution and abortion rights to face up and make their voices heard. We’re not going again—not ever.
— Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) May 3, 2022
Rep. Ayanna Pressley mentioned the choice factors to the necessity for Democrats to abolish the filibuster.
“Abortion care is a fundamental human right and we must legislate like it,” she mentioned. “The Senate must act before it’s too late. Abolish the filibuster. Pass the Women’s Health Protection Act.”
Abortion care is a basic human proper and we should legislate prefer it.
The Senate should act earlier than it’s too late.
Abolish the filibuster. Pass the Women’s Health Protection Act.
— Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (@RepPressley) May 3, 2022
Rep. Jake Auchincloss mentioned the opinion factors to the necessity for Congress to behave.
“Reproductive health care is a human right. Congress must protect abortion access, because regardless of the final ruling, we know that SCOTUS can’t be relied upon to uphold Roe,” he mentioned.
Reproductive well being care is a human proper. Congress should shield abortion entry, as a result of whatever the remaining ruling, we all know that SCOTUS cannot be relied upon to uphold Roe. https://t.co/H1snAFLDuM
— Rep. Jake Auchincloss (@RepAuchincloss) May 3, 2022
Not all response in Massachusetts was damaging, nonetheless.
Massachusett Citizen for Life, which has opposed entry to abortion for many years, welcomed the draft, saying if the opinion was made remaining, the group, “will be very pleased that justices recognized that our Constitution does not imply or permit abortion on demand.”
“Today, we remain focused on our efforts to protect the dignity of the human person and extend human rights to all, born and preborn,” mentioned mentioned MCFL President Myrna Maloney Flynn. “However, we acknowledge that such a ruling would be a historic win for the pro-life movement, and a moment pro-life advocates have worked toward for 49 years — a half century that saw the tragic loss of 65 million lives as a result of Roe v. Wade.”
Polling exhibits comparatively few Americans need to see Roe overturned.
In 2020, AP VoteCast discovered that 69% of voters within the presidential election mentioned the Supreme Court ought to depart the Roe v. Wade determination as is; simply 29% mentioned the court docket ought to overturn the choice. In common, AP-NORC polling finds a majority of the general public favors abortion being authorized in most or all circumstances.
Still, when requested about abortion coverage typically, Americans have nuanced attitudes on the difficulty, and plenty of don’t assume that abortion needs to be potential after the primary trimester or that girls ought to have the ability to acquire a authorized abortion for any motive.
Alito, within the draft, mentioned the court docket can’t predict how the general public would possibly react and shouldn’t hassle. “We cannot allow our decisions to be affected by any extraneous influences such as concern about the public’s reaction to our work,” Alito wrote within the draft opinion, based on Politico.
— Material from Herald wire providers used on this report.
Source: www.bostonherald.com”