Kemi Badenoch has mentioned former Post Office chair Henry Staunton was being investigated over bullying allegations earlier than his dismissal – as she accused him of in search of “revenge” towards the federal government.
The enterprise secretary informed the Commons that allegations relating to Mr Staunton’s conduct, together with “serious matters such as bullying”, had been being examined and issues had additionally been raised about his “willingness to co-operate” with the formal investigation.
Speaking within the Commons, Ms Badenoch mentioned: “Mr Staunton claimed that I told him that someone’s got to take the rap for the Horizon scandal and that was the reason for his dismissal,” she mentioned. “That was not the reason at all.
Politics Live: Army applications soar after warnings of possible war conscription
“I dismissed him as a result of there have been critical issues about his behaviour as chair, together with these raised from different administrators on the board.
“My department found significant governance issues, for example, with the recruitment of a new senior independence director to the Post Office board.”
But shortly after Ms Badenoch made her assertion, a spokesperson for Mr Staunton launched a recent assertion hitting again on the “astonishing” claims, saying it was the “first time the existence of such allegations have been mentioned”.
“Mr Staunton is not aware of any aspect of his conduct which could give rise to such allegations,” they added.
“They were certainly not raised by the secretary of state at any stage and certainly not during the conversation which led to Mr Staunton’s dismissal. Such behaviour would in any case be totally out of character.”
The heated trade got here after Mr Staunton, who was dismissed from his submit final month, claimed in an interview with The Sunday Times that he was informed to delay pay-outs to sub-postmasters forward of the following common election because of issues about prices.
Speaking within the Commons, Ms Badenoch mentioned the declare was “completely false” and accused Mr Staunton of in search of “revenge” after he was sacked.
Politics Live: Army functions soar after warnings of doable warfare conscription
‘Pretty apparent to everybody’
Mr Staunton stood by his claims about stalled compensation this night and earlier informed Sky News it “pretty obvious what was really going on” following the federal government denials.
Mr Staunton mentioned there was “no real movement” on the payouts till after the airing of the ITV drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office earlier this yr.
He added: “It was in the interests of the business, as well as being fair for the postmasters, that there was faster progress on exoneration and that compensation was more generous, but we didn’t see any real movement until after the Mr Bates programme.
“I feel it’s fairly apparent to everybody what was actually happening.”
Read more from Sky News:
Aristocrat ‘debated whether to cremate baby with petroleum’
Sunak appearance on GB News investigated
Drug dealer who doled out Christmas party bags jailed
But Ms Badenoch told MPs this afternoon there was “no proof by any means that that is true”.
“For Henry Staunton to recommend in any other case, for no matter private motives, is a shame and it dangers damaging confidence within the compensation schemes that ministers and civil servants are working so arduous to ship,” she said.
“I might hope that most individuals studying the interview in yesterday’s Sunday Times would see it for what it was: a blatant try to hunt revenge following dismissal.”
As the disagreement between the pair ramped up, opposition events demanded the federal government launch all paperwork referring to Mr Staunton’s sacking to supply readability on the allegations.
In his interview with The Sunday Times, Mr Staunton claimed that when he was sacked Ms Badenoch had informed him “someone’s got to take the rap” for the Post Office scandal – and that he was supplied no apology for studying about his dismissal from Sky News.
A readout of a name between the pair, seen by Sky News, exhibits that Ms Badenoch did apologise, however just for the decision being at brief discover.
‘Truly surprising’
As properly as denying the claims, the enterprise division additionally printed a letter despatched to Mr Staunton after his appointment which mentioned one in every of his priorities must be to resolve historic litigation points referring to the Horizon software program.
However, Labour described the allegations had been “truly shocking” and mentioned there have been “clear discrepancies” within the accounts of Mr Staunton’s brief time as chairman.
Mr Staunton grew to become chairman of the Post Office in December 2022, however he was ousted final month as the federal government reeled from the backlash of its dealing with of the Horizon scandal.
This noticed lots of of sub-postmasters prosecuted due to discrepancies within the Horizon IT system between 1999 and 2015, in what has been known as the most important miscarriage of justice in UK historical past.
The airing of Mr Bates Vs The Post Office final month led to widespread outrage and guarantees from the federal government to introduce a brand new regulation to exonerate all victims and velocity up the compensation course of.
Read extra:
Postmistress felt she needed to grovel for compensation
Fujitsu ‘to have obtained £3.4bn’ regardless of function in Post Office scandal
Appearing reverse Ms Badenoch within the Commons, shadow enterprise secretary Jonathan Reynolds mentioned the revelations in The Sunday Times “could not be more serious”.
He singled out the declare that the Post Office was “instructed to deliberately go slow on compensation payments” to wrongly convicted sub-postmasters to avoid wasting the federal government cash forward of an election.
He added it will be a “further outrageous insult to a scandal that has already rocked faith in the fairness of the British state”, if true.
Mr Staunton claimed he obtained the route from a senior determine in Whitehall, however a spokesman for the federal government mentioned on Sunday it “utterly” rejected the declare and mentioned Mr Staunton was given “concrete objectives” to concentrate on reaching settlements.
Source: information.sky.com”