Facebook co-founder and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg sits in his seat inside a bipartisan Artificial Intelligence Insight Forum for all U.S. senators hosted by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 13, 2023.
Leah Millis | Reuters
While Republican and Democratic lawmakers seem extra incapable than ever of working collectively to go laws, they largely agree on one factor: Meta’s detrimental affect on youngsters and youths.
A bipartisan coalition of 33 attorneys basic filed a joint federal lawsuit on Tuesday, accusing Faceboook’s dad or mum of knowingly implementing addictive options throughout its household of apps which have detrimental results on youngsters’s psychological well being and contribute to issues like teenage consuming problems.
Another 9 attorneys basic are additionally submitting lawsuits of their respective states.
“Kids and teenagers are suffering from record levels of poor mental health and social media companies like Meta are to blame,” Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, mentioned in a press release. “Meta has profited from children’s pain by intentionally designing its platforms with manipulative features that make children addicted to their platforms while lowering their self-esteem.
Meanwhile, Tennessee’s Republican Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti noted that polarization in politics is unlike anything this country has seen “for the reason that Civil War.” Yet Skrmetti is firmly in James’s camp when it comes to Meta.
“For the entire attorneys basic from each events, individuals who ceaselessly disagree very vocally and really publicly, to all come collectively and to maneuver in the identical course, I believe that claims one thing,” Skrmetti said at a press conference after the lawsuit was filed.
The political dysfunction is most acute right now in the House of Representatives, which has been without a Speaker for three weeks after a small band of eight hardline conservative Republicans joined all Democrats to approve a “movement to vacate” introduced by GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida.
California’s Kevin McCarthy, who was booted as speaker, angered some members of his party by working with Democrats to avoid a government shutdown, even though he bowed down to many of those same lawmakers in September in instructing Republican-led committees to open an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.
U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) sits with fellow lawmakers as the House of Representatives votes for the third time on whether to elevate Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) to Speaker of the House in the U.S. Capitol on October 20, 2023 in Washington, DC.
Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images
When it comes to Mark Zuckerberg, legislators seem to find common ground. In 2020, for instance, a group of attorneys general from 48 states and territories filed two separate antitrust-related lawsuits against the company.
Despite their general disapproval of Facebook, Instagram and company leadership, party leaders don’t necessarily have the same specific criticisms of Meta.
Democrats like to focus on the company’s history of data privacy scandals. In July, for example, Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and other Democratic lawmakers called on the Biden administration to follow up on their probe showing how tax-preparation companies share sensitive taxpayer data with tech giants like Meta and Google.
“The sharing of taxpayer knowledge with Meta has put taxpayer privateness in danger and seems to characterize a violation of taxpayer privateness legal guidelines,” the Warren-led group wrote in a report titled “Attacks on Tax Privacy.”
Leading Republicans have focused more on Meta’s content moderation policies, which they say unfairly censor conservative views. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, has accused Zuckerberg and Meta of working with the White House to censor voices and posts that expressed disagreement with the Biden Administration.
Jordan’s committee was even considering holding Zuckerberg in contempt of Congress until Meta provided the lawmakers with documents they were seeking as part of their censorship investigation. Democrats were notably silent over the Republicans’ censorship claims.
Where the parties converge is in seeing the harmful effects on kids.
Dave Yost, Ohio’s Republican attorney general, said in a statement that the bipartisan lawsuit is needed to “compel the corporate to vary its methods” because parents are letting kids use Meta’s apps.
“Given that youngsters, after they’re on these platforms, turn out to be weak to cyberbullying and on-line predators, Meta has added insult to harm, additional injuring our youngsters,” Yost said.
On the other side of the aisle, Pennsylvania’s Democratic AG Michelle Henry said, “The time has come for social media giants to cease buying and selling in our youngsters’s psychological well being for large earnings.”
In citing the lawsuit, Henry said in a press release that “Meta not solely targets younger minds with addictive, dangerous, trap-door content material – it additionally lies to the general public and fogeys about how their platforms are protected.”
Andy Stone, a Meta spokesperson, said in a statement that the company has introduced more than 30 tools “to help teenagers and their households.”
“We’re disenchanted that as a substitute of working productively with corporations throughout the trade to create clear, age-appropriate requirements for the various apps teenagers use, the attorneys basic have chosen this path,” he said.
Additional reporting by Lauren Feiner
WATCH: Dozens of bipartisan state attorneys general sue Meta for addictive features targeting kids
Source: www.cnbc.com”