The Ministry of Defence has refused to disclaim UK particular forces have been working in Ukraine after US categorised navy paperwork had been allegedly leaked and printed on-line.
The claims have been broadly reported after the paperwork had been shared on Twitter and Telegram.
A Ministry of Defence spokesperson has warned in opposition to taking allegations contained in the reported leak at “face value”.
A spokesperson mentioned in a message posted on Twitter: “The widely reported leak of alleged classified US information has demonstrated a serious level of inaccuracy.
“Readers must be cautious about taking at face worth allegations which have the potential to unfold disinformation.”
Media retailers have reported {that a} doc, dated 23 March, signifies as many as 50 UK particular forces personnel have been deployed to the nation alongside different western particular forces.
But the doc reportedly doesn’t state the place the allegedly deployed forces are situated or what they’re doing.
Chris Meagher, a spokesman for the Pentagon, has urged warning in “promoting or amplifying any of these documents”, including that “it does appear that slides have been doctored”.
The paperwork might first have been printed in a chatroom on Discord, a social media platform fashionable with players, Associated Press reported.
An unidentified chatroom consumer shared paperwork that had been allegedly categorised, first typing them out with their very own ideas, then, as of some months in the past, starting to put up photos of papers with folds in them.
The posts seem to have gone unnoticed outdoors of the chat till just a few weeks in the past, once they started to flow into extra broadly on social media.
Many particulars shared by the particular person haven’t been independently verified and the unique chatroom has been deleted.
Asked on Monday if the US authorities was successfully ready for extra intelligence paperwork to point out up on-line, National Security Council spokesman John Kirby replied: “The truth and the honest answer to your question is: We don’t know. And is that a matter of concern to us? You’re darn right it is.”
It comes after the US defence division started investigating who’s accountable for the doubtless damaging leak.
Read extra:
Russian ambassador has ‘proof’ UK particular forces concerned in assault
The New York Times, which first reported the breach, quoted navy analysts as saying the recordsdata seem to have been modified in sure elements, which might level to an try by Moscow to unfold disinformation.
Wall Street Journal correspondent Yaroslav Trofimov mentioned Russian propaganda channels appeared to have photoshopped at the very least one of many paperwork after the unique ones had been posted.
Mr Trofimov famous how there was all of the sudden a major improve within the variety of Ukrainian casualties and tools losses recorded and a large lower within the Russian battle harm.
Ukrainian presidential official, Mykhailo Podolyak, mentioned the leak appeared like a Russian disinformation operation, saying that it contained a “very large amount of fictitious information”.
Click to subscribe to Ukraine War Diaries wherever you get your podcasts
The act of stealing secret paperwork and leaking them both with or with out modifications is a long-standing weapon of knowledge warfare designed to undermine an opponent.
It would profit Russia for details about Ukraine’s battle plans and Western help to be leaked on-line.
The categorised recordsdata – together with one marked “top secret” and one other marked “secret” – are dated from late February and early March.
They don’t reveal particular dates or particulars about Ukraine’s anticipated spring offensive within the east and south of the nation.
But they do supply clues in regards to the form of navy formations that Western allies are serving to their Ukrainian companions construct up.
The New York Times mentioned US officers had been making an attempt to have the recordsdata taken down off the social media websites.
However, as of final Friday morning, variations of the leaks had been nonetheless being broadly shared.
Source: information.sky.com”