Speculation over whether or not or not Vladimir Putin will use nuclear weapons has been rife and the results could possibly be disastrous for the West and the Russian president
With Russia’s invasion stalling and the Ukrainian assault on the Kerch Bridge have each contributed to elevated concern Putin might escalate from typical weapons to a tactical nuclear strike.
The US President Joe Biden stated final week that the world was the closest it had been to “Armageddon” at any level because the Cuban Missile Crisis, after extra sabre rattling from the Kremlin.
NATO says that such a transfer would in all probability result in a “physical response” from Ukraine, her allies and even NATO itself.
It stated any use of nuclear weapons would have “unprecedented consequences” and that Moscow was utilizing its nuclear threats primarily to discourage NATO and different international locations from intervening immediately in Ukraine.
What measures might the West take if Putin goes nuclear?
Former Ukrainian defence minister, Andriy Zagorodnyuk, has stated that NATO has a number of choices ought to Putin make a “terrible” resolution.
Writing in Foreign Affairs he stated: “It might not even need a land operation, the Western coalition could credibly tell the Kremlin that it would hit Russian capabilities with direct missile strikes and airstrikes, destroying its military facilities and disabling its Black Sea fleet.
“It might threaten to chop all its communications with digital warfare and organize a cyber-blackout towards all the Russian army.”
He added that “breaking the nuclear taboo” might additionally provoke repercussions from China and India, which might be one other blow to the Kremlin.
Is the West doing something to discourage a nuclear assault?
Professor Michael Clarke, former director-general of the Royal United Services Institute, stated the Kremlin had already been warned in regards to the penalties of escalation.
He stated: “When the tactical nuclear weapon threats were raised a few weeks ago, the US and three or four NATO members personally contacted their counterparts in Russia and in the Russian general staff to say ‘don’t even think about it’.
“They will not inform us what they stated and nor ought to they as a result of there has bought to be some uncertainty about this with a view to preserve a deterrent however what they appear to have stated is initially ‘we won’t be passive’.
“Second, we won’t go nuclear, but we will go conventional, and we have the conventional power to hit all of your nuclear infrastructure and facilities. If we even think that you’re going nuclear, if we see the preparations start – we might attack you’.
“That appears to have been the message.”
Should the West be doing extra now?
Alexander Gabuev, a senior fellow of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, has stated Russia’s newest missile assaults in Ukraine have been “a sad reminder that the most horrific pages of this ugly war are still ahead of us”.
The “Kremlin’s response is becoming ever more erratic disproportionate and destructive,” he stated.
Discussing Russia’s response to the blast on Kerch Bridge – a key route from Russia to Crimea – Mr Gabuev stated this confirmed Russia “still has a vast toolkit for escalation”.
He stated: “Given the high stakes and emotions, the window for diplomacy is likely to open at the most dramatic moment: for example, when Putin starts to unpack his nuclear toolkit, which will be visible to NATO and involve a lot of signalling by Moscow.
“Only then may the Ukrainian and western publics be satisfied there’s an pressing want to barter.”
He added that negotiations would have to involve President Biden “because the Kremlin considers him the one actual head of the opposing coalition” and the sooner they started, the better.
What do the Ukrainian people think?
A nuclear attack wouldn’t change anything about the Ukrainian people’s resolve to fight, a Ukrainian MP has claimed.
The Ukrainian MP Yelyzaveta Yasko told Kay Burley: “Putin would not have any logic any extra. It’s not attainable to justify Putin any extra.
“We understand that he’s in his final battle of his life where he wants to prove to all the world that he can do whatever he wants, including taking land, killing thousands of people, destroying infrastructure, and we understand that nuclear threat and a strike is very possible, but it’s not going to change a lot on the scene of Ukraine.
“Of course, it is a catastrophe. It’s catastrophic for me. It’s a giant tragedy to see hundreds of individuals being killed, wounded, destroyed lives.
“But it’s not going to change the rule of Ukrainian people to restore justice and to restore our territorial sovereignty.”
Read extra
Attack on NATO vitality provides would provoke ‘united and decided response’, alliance chief vows
Zelenskyy vows to make battlefield ‘extra painful’ for Russian forces after one other day of lethal rocket strikes on Ukraine
Opinions divided in Moscow after Kremlin’s escalation in Ukraine
Why the West ought to cease sounding so nervous a few nuclear assault
Ian Bond, from the Centre for European Reform, says the West must cease being – and sounding – afraid of a nuclear assault.
He advised the Doomsday Watch podcast: “Nothing is as provocative to Putin as weakness, so the more the West says ‘We are afraid that Russia might use nuclear weapons’, the more likely that Putin is to continue making the threat of using nuclear weapons – and perhaps even use one or two to demonstrate he really means it.”
Bond says the message to Russia, which could possibly be delivered privately, must be: “Please understand that if you go nuclear, we will regard the gloves as being off.”
While accepting that nobody might “absolutely rule out” Russia utilizing nuclear weapons, he added: “We should stop frightening ourselves with the Bogeyman that if the Ukrainians drive the Russians out, the Russians are going to go nuclear, I just don’t buy that.”
Source: information.sky.com”