A double homicide suspect described being “apocalyptically angry” earlier than hitting a lady on the again of the top with a hammer in a home in Dundee.
Warning: This story accommodates graphic content material
Andrew Innes, 52, denies murdering Bennylyn Burke, 25, and her two-year-old daughter, Jellica, and has as a substitute lodged a particular defence of diminished duty.
Giving proof throughout his trial on the High Court in Edinburgh on Thursday, Innes was questioned over his buy of a hammer from a B&Q on the morning of Ms Burke’s dying.
He mentioned: “It was ridiculous that I had returned with a hammer when I went out for petrol.”
When he returned house from purchasing, Ms Burke, who was initially from the Philippines then moved to Bristol, was within the kitchen cooking. It was there Innes attacked her.
‘I used to be apocalyptically indignant’
Innes defined that Ms Burke reminded him of his spouse, who he had separated from and presently lives in Japan, and one other former associate, stating that “from the neck down” Ms Burke was much like his spouse and from “the head up” like the opposite lady.
He mentioned he “thought of all the nasty stuff” his spouse had allegedly carried out and said the opposite lady “left him in the most horrible way”.
Innes mentioned: “I was apocalyptically angry.”
It was then that he attacked Ms Burke with the hammer.
He instructed the courtroom it was “not a useful weapon”, noting that he had a samurai sword in his workplace.
Innes said: “If this was premeditated in any way it would have been way cleaner.”
He claimed at one level Ms Burke chased him with the hammer. Ms Burke was later stabbed.
Innes mentioned he remembered the “initial strike” and wrestling on the kitchen flooring earlier than it spilled into the lounge.
He mentioned: “I was just hitting her until she stopped moving.”
Innes later added: “It was an anger I have never experienced before in my entire life.”
‘I used to be insane because of the steroids’
During questioning by defence lawyer Brian McConnachie KC, Innes said that he killed Jellica two or three days after Ms Burke and buried them each below his kitchen flooring.
He mentioned the toddler needed her mum, including that it “seemed logical to me to put her with her mum”.
Asked why he killed Jellica, he replied: “Because I was insane as a result of the steroids.”
The jury have been instructed that Innes was taking steroid medicine for a situation and had not slept on the time of the deaths.
Read extra:
Andrew Innes admits killing Bennylyn and Jellica Burke however denies homicide
Toddler ‘killed throughout recreation of conceal and search’, courtroom hears
Andrew Innes instructed police officer: ‘She’s below the ground’
A joint minute of agreed proof between prosecutors and the defence staff was learn out to a jury at first of the trial.
It was accepted that Innes stabbed Ms Burke with a knife in addition to repeatedly placing her on the top with a hammer and the deal with of the blade.
It was additionally accepted that Innes asphyxiated Jellica earlier than burying each our bodies below the kitchen flooring of his property.
Innes denies an extra cost of raping a major school-aged little one and making an attempt to defeat the ends of justice.
All of the alleged incidents are mentioned to have taken place at Innes’s home in Troon Avenue, Dundee, between 20 February and 5 March 2021.
The trial, earlier than Lord Beckett, continues.
Source: information.sky.com”