The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank was a “Lehman moment” for the expertise trade, in line with a high Goldman Sachs dealmaker.
Cliff Marriott, co-head of expertise, media and telecoms in Europe for the funding banking division of Goldman Sachs, stated that the March 10 shutdown of SVB was “pretty stressful,” because the lender’s clientele scrambled to determine how they might make payroll.
“That first weekend was a little bit like the Lehman moment for technology and it was really more operational for those companies,” Marriott informed CNBC’s Arjun Kharpal.
“They needed access to capital. A lot of their balances were on SVB. And, secondly, SVB was propelling and making a lot of their payments for payroll to pay their employees.”
Founded in 1983, SVB was thought of a dependable supply of funding for tech startups and enterprise capital corporations. A subsidiary of SVB Financial Group, the California-based business lender was, at one level, the sixteenth greatest financial institution within the U.S. and the most important in Silicon Valley by deposits.
SVB was taken over by the U.S. authorities after its clientele of enterprise capitalists and tech startups withdrew billions from their accounts. Many VCs had suggested portfolio corporations to tug funds on the again of fears that the lender might crumble.
SVB Financial Group’s holdings — property corresponding to U.S. Treasury payments and government-backed mortgage securities that had been seen as protected — had been hit by the Fed’s aggressive rate of interest hikes, and their worth dropped dramatically.
Earlier this month, the agency revealed it had bought $21 billion price of its securities at a roughly $1.8 billion loss and stated it wanted to lift $2.25 billion to fulfill shoppers’ withdrawal wants and fund new lending.
The way forward for SVB stays unsure, despite the fact that deposits had been finally backstopped by the federal government and SVB’s government-appointed CEO tried to reassure shoppers that the financial institution remained open for enterprise.
Marriott stated that there’s “still a big question mark regarding what bank or firm or set of firms is going to replace SVB in terms of providing those utility-like services for technology, giving them bank accounts, allowing them to make payroll, holding their cash balances.”
The SVB collapse has additionally raised questions over the potential penalties for different banks, with SVB being removed from the one lender that has come underneath pressure. Swiss funding banking titan Credit Suisse was rescued by its primary rival UBS in a government-backed, cut-price deal final week.
Marriott additionally addressed tech IPOs and their outlook for 2023. Europe’s tech IPO market has been largely closed on account of a confluence of market pressures, together with larger rates of interest, which make the longer term cashflows of high-growth tech corporations much less enticing.
Marriott stated that he would have been extra optimistic a couple of restoration in tech IPO exercise two weeks in the past.
“I’m still hopeful that we’ll see tech IPO activity in 2023. And if we don’t, I think 2024 will be a big year for tech IPOs,” Marriott stated.
“I think what we’ll see is the more established profitable companies come first, so the easier to understand business models, profitable companies, before we see the really highly valued profit or negative profit companies that we saw in 2021.”
WATCH: ‘Sea of sameness’: Are smartphone makers out of concepts?
Source: www.cnbc.com”