After years of debate over the Hall of Fame worthiness of gamers linked to performance-enhancing medication, baseball’s Steroids Era stands trial this weekend in San Diego on the 2022 winter conferences.
If Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens are chosen to the Hall of Fame by the 16-member Contemporary Era committee that convenes Sunday, reversing 10 years of voting outcomes by the Baseball Writers’ Association of America, it may open the doorways to the hallowed museum in Cooperstown, N.Y., to Alex Rodriguez, Manny Ramirez and others whose in any other case stellar careers had been tainted by PED allegations.
But if Bonds and Clemens don’t get 75% of the vote, they’ll have to attend at the very least three extra years and a precedent may have been set for a unique group of voters that can determine on the subsequent Contemporary Era poll (Nineteen Eighties-present) in 2025.
In different phrases, the committee, which I desire to think about as baseball’s Supreme Court, could have the ultimate phrase on the so-called Steroids Era.
The Hall of Fame couldn’t have chosen a greater group of representatives from the ranks of Hall of Famers, executives and media members. Former Chicago Cubs President Theo Epstein, Chicago White Sox govt vp Ken Williams and Miami Marlins common supervisor Kim Ng are among the many six executives, whereas the checklist of former gamers consists of Greg Maddux, Ryne Sandberg, Frank Thomas, Lee Smith and Alan Trammell.
I’ve recognized and coated many of the voters and might attest they’ve two issues in frequent — robust opinions and a deep respect for the historical past of the sport. Now they’ll be leaving a mark on the best way the sport offers with an period that stained the reputations of a lot of its best gamers.
Our esteemed Supreme Court judges shall be debating the deserves of eight gamers: the aforementioned Bonds and Clemens, Rafael Palmeiro, Don Mattingly, Albert Belle, Fred McGriff, Dale Murphy and Curt Schilling. Each committee member can vote for under three. An announcement shall be made Sunday night time on which, if any, met the 75% threshold.
Unfortunately the ballots won’t be revealed, in contrast to the overwhelming majority of these solid by BBWAA members within the annual course of. The Twitter Hall of Fame tracker run by Ryan Thibodaux’s @NotMrTibbs account makes writers accountable. But the Supreme Court members gained’t need to cope with the hostile and infrequently profane reactions on Twitter from those that disagree with writers’ picks.
So Epstein gained’t have to clarify why he did or didn’t vote for Schilling, whom he acquired in a commerce when he was the Boston Red Sox common supervisor. Thomas gained’t need to say whether or not he solid a vote for Belle, his former teammate with the White Sox. And nobody must clarify their stance on PED candidates.
Of the eight candidates on the Contemporary Era poll, I had an opportunity to vote for seven as an eligible BBWAA voter. If reminiscence serves me appropriately, the one one I voted for was Belle, who by no means had an opportunity after spending a lot of his profession growling on the media members whose votes he wanted. The corked-bat episode didn’t assist.
Like Schilling, who barely missed getting elected on the BBWAA poll in his tenth and ultimate yr in 2021, Belle’s hostility to writers most likely price him many votes. The former gamers on the Supreme Court could also be extra amenable to those two misanthropes, nevertheless it takes solely 5 “no” votes to disclaim entrance.
Bonds and Clemens stand out on the poll as a result of they clearly could be within the Hall with out the affiliation with PEDs. No one argues they weren’t two of the best gamers ever. Whether alleged dishonest towards the top of their careers ought to penalize them is the query. Palmeiro equally was denied by the BBWAA for PED use however by no means got here shut, in contrast to Bonds and Clemens.
So are there 5 “anti-steroid” votes on the committee? The Chicago connection may present a key.
Sandberg made his emotions recognized about PED customers throughout his Hall of Fame speech in 2005, lauding teammate Andre Dawson’s 1987 MVP season as a “remarkable” feat.
“He did it the right way, the natural way,” Sandberg mentioned to a lot applause.
Later that yr Sandberg was amongst a gaggle of Hall of Famers that spoke at a Senate listening to on PED use in baseball, calling for harsh penalties and saying, “We owe America’s pastime a strict policy.”
Maddux mentioned earlier than his Hall induction in 2014 that he had no sympathy for gamers being denied for PED use.
“I know you’re responsible for your actions,” Maddux mentioned. “You never know when it’s going to come up. At the time, I think everyone was aware it wasn’t the right thing to do, but they did it anyway. It wasn’t that big a deal in the ‘90s, but now it is. You’re kind of responsible for your own actions, and now they’re paying the price.”
Thomas was so outspoken, he known as for voluntary drug testing in 2002 — earlier than it grew to become necessary — after former slugger and admitted consumer Jose Canseco claimed 85% of major-leaguers took PEDs.
“I want testing tomorrow, pitchers included,” Thomas mentioned that day. “I think a lot of pitchers are on it, too, to throw harder and get more of an animal mentality. That stuff gives you an animal mentality, to focus on just killing the baseball.”
When he was elected to the Hall in 2014, I requested Thomas if he believed PED customers finally could be enshrined alongside him.
“They’re not going to get in,” he replied. “And talking to all the Hall of Famers, they’re going to boycott (if anyone gets elected) to make sure they don’t get in. They’ve already said to me: ‘Frank, it’s OK to like your peers and do so much with them, but a lot of them did a lot of bad stuff to the game and they shouldn’t be rewarded for something they weren’t naturally gifted to do. They cheated.’”
Times change, and possibly a few of their views have softened over time. A New York Times report mentioned Maddux said on David Cone’s podcast in January: “I think there’s guys that are good enough to be in the Hall of Fame if they didn’t take them, so I think they’re OK if they get in.”
So who is aware of which method they’ll go? Making the voting extra sophisticated is the Bud Selig conundrum. The former baseball commissioner who presided over the Steroids Era was elected to the Hall by a Veterans Committee in 2017, so would denying entrance to alleged PED customers be hypocritical?
It figures to be an enchanting debate — albeit behind closed doorways — and maybe probably the most carefully watched vote within the historical past of Veterans Committees.
At the very least, the decision by the Supreme Court ought to begin the winter conferences with a bang.
()
Source: www.bostonherald.com