Residents of the northwest suburbs had been skeptical Wednesday about infrastructure modifications and utilizing taxpayer {dollars} to fund the Chicago Bears’ proposed redevelopment of Arlington Park International Racecourse at an occasion hosted by a pair of libertarian and conservative teams.
Advertised as a debate, “Don’t Feed the Bears …?” is the latest in a string of initiatives by the libertarian political advocacy group Americans for Prosperity opposing using public cash in any Bears-related improvement in Arlington Heights. The group is funded by the conservative billionaire Koch Brothers. The Heartland Institute additionally opposes utilizing public cash on the staff.
Many of the 20 attendees who spoke to the Tribune mentioned they had been Heartland Institute regulars and arrived against utilizing public cash for the stadium and accompanying mixed-use business and residential district the Bears have pitched.
Jim Lakely, vice chairman and director of communications for Heartland Institute, mentioned the group invited Arlington Heights Mayor Thomas Hayes and different village leaders to take part within the debate Aug. 29, however that Hayes declined.
Most individuals who got here out to the Heartland’s Breitbart Freedom Center weren’t from Arlington Heights however close by communities comparable to Palatine, Wilmette and Rolling Meadows. Americans for Prosperity Illinois Deputy State Director Brian Costin later mentioned they hoped to succeed in extra Arlington Heights residents by way of the occasion’s livestream, however famous that the Bears’ potential redevelopment of Arlington Park would impression the complete area.
Jean Link, 73, of Arlington Heights, got here able to pay attention, understanding she’d be immediately affected if the Bears finalize their $197.2 million buy settlement for the location.
Link mentioned she’d been to Heartland Institute capabilities earlier than however attended Wednesday as a result of she was “interested in the tax situation.”
“I understand that the Bears organization will be funding the stadium,” she mentioned.
But, she added, she anticipated Arlington Heights taxpayers would find yourself on the hook for at the very least among the redevelopment prices on the 326-acre web site.
Bears management has mentioned the staff will solely search public funding for the mixed-use improvement they’ve proposed constructing close to the stadium.
At a Sept. 8 public assembly coordinated by the staff, Bears President George McCaskey mentioned with out public assist on infrastructure, “the project as described tonight will not be able to move forward.”
“I want to understand what participation is expected of the people who reside in Arlington Heights,” Link mentioned.
For Link the occasion “confirmed that the Bears do plan to subsidize their own stadium, but all the other buildings in the area would be subject to taxes in the community.”
Link mentioned she disagreed with that strategy. She was additionally involved with among the visitors and infrastructure considerations that had been raised.
“I live north of where the stadium would be built,” she mentioned. “I will be impacted by the traffic.”
Specifically, Link mentioned, she was fearful about what would occur to Route 53 if the Bears land in Arlington Heights.
That was the prime concern of Anthony Ciani, 45, of Palatine. He mentioned he lives close to Route 53 and that he anticipated the Bears’ arrival within the space would necessitate an growth of that street.
Ciani mentioned he feared the Illinois Department of Transportation would make an expanded Route 53 right into a tollway.
“All of these communities around here will become toll locked, so you really won’t be able to go anywhere without using the tollway,” he mentioned. “That’s probably the biggest concern.”
Ciani mentioned he noticed some attraction to having the Bears redevelop Arlington Park. But “think about it this way,” he continued. “They’re going to need to redo the sewer. They’re gonna need to do some roadway, some on-ramps. It might come out to $500 million.”
Ciani estimated that the Bears would spend round $4 billion on the venture total.
Compared with the general value of the venture, Ciani mentioned he thought “the Bears can easily include (infrastructure) in any plan that they’ve got.”
Terry Przybylski, 66, of Des Plaines, mentioned his predominant takeaway was that “pro football is an exceedingly big business,” although he mentioned he understood the motivation for a staff to hunt public monetary help for a venture like Arlington Park.
“They must feel they’re in a very unsatisfactory situation in Chicago,” he mentioned.
But Przybylski left the presentation unsympathetic to the Bears’ request.
“I really don’t think the use of public funds is really justified for a business that is going to be dealing billions of dollars, when there are other very pressing concerns that local governments have,” he mentioned.
Hayes has mentioned that utilizing taxpayer funds to convey the staff to the village is a “last resort.”
Without representatives from the village in attendance, Heartland Institute President James Taylor made what he referred to as a “devil’s advocate” argument for publicly funding the venture whereas Costin, of Americans for Prosperity, ran via arguments in opposition to public subsidies.
Costin’s presentation centered on the potential impression of a tax increment financing, or TIF district, that Arlington Heights may set up as a means to assist fund the infrastructure related to the mixed-use business and residential improvement the Bears have proposed.
TIF districts work by freezing property taxes and utilizing tax income that is available in over a set interval to pay for infrastructure enhancements to the world. Usually, a TIF district has an expiration date after which level tax income would move as ordinary to completely different taxing our bodies.
Costin informed the viewers that whereas a TIF district won’t immediately subsidize the stadium, “(the Bears) could use the stadium to take money from the taxpayers and put it in their other pocket.”
“The property taxes that they pay would come out of their left pocket, go into the TIF district, and then go back into their right hand pocket for the infrastructure costs that they were supposed to pay,” Costin mentioned.
Costin claimed such a setup would possibly funnel $220 million price of property tax income to the Bears over a 10-year interval. He additionally warned concerning the impression that this type of property tax diversion may have on native college districts and different businesses that run on taxpayer cash.
When Taylor took the rostrum, he informed the viewers he agreed with Costin’s viewpoint and wouldn’t make a monetary argument for why public cash ought to assist fund the redevelopment at Arlington Park. Instead, he prompt that individuals contemplate that public cash helps fund a variety of cultural sights, significantly the humanities.
“Arlington Heights, (according to) publicly available numbers, spends a little more than $200,000 each year for its Metropolis Performing Arts Center,” Taylor mentioned. “That facility draws approximately 50,000 attendees per year, that amounts to a subsidy of about $4 per attendee.”
Taylor mentioned that based mostly on projected attendance ranges at a possible Bears stadium, the subsidy per Bears fan would really be decrease — about $3 per attendee.
“If you’re not going to oppose those other subsidies, I think you need to come up with a good reason why you would be opposed to subsidizing the Bears,” Taylor mentioned.
Americans for Prosperity Illinois has saved up strain on the village to not supply the Bears public cash for the stadium and surrounding improvement over protests from village leaders that the group’s proposal would kneecap Arlington Heights’ potential to convey companies to the village.
They have circulated a petition, which Costin submitted final month, that might bar the village from extending any form of monetary help to any company looking for to open there.
The petition has gotten signatures from at the very least 1% of the registered voting inhabitants of the village, permitting Americans for Prosperity to submit it to the Village Board for consideration as an ordinance.
If the village rejects the ordinance and Americans for Prosperity gathers signatures representing 12% of the voting inhabitants, then the proposal would seem on the poll on the subsequent village election as a referendum.
The group additionally launched a ballot that mentioned 72% of respondents supported the Bears’ transfer to the village however that 68% opposed using public cash to convey them to Arlington Heights.
Hayes has hit again on the group, calling them outsiders who’re utilizing the village to advance a political agenda and questioning the slant of the questions within the ballot that discovered opposition to using public cash for Bears-related improvement.
The village has taken some preliminary steps relating to the redevelopment, together with hiring two consultants for financial impression and visitors evaluation. Earlier this month, village leaders hosted a committee of the entire assembly for residents to air considerations concerning the redevelopment and talk about the staff’s presentation.
()
Source: www.bostonherald.com