The Diehl marketing campaign is hitting again after a latest New York Times piece appeared to point the Republican nominee wouldn’t decide to accepting the outcomes of the overall election in November.
“Liberal news organizations are obsessed with trying to get Republican politicians to commit to accepting the results of the 2022 election before it happens. These ‘gotcha’ questions from liberal outlets are not worth engaging in because all they are trying to do is weave a false narrative,” Republican gubernatorial candidate Geoff Diehl advised the Herald in an emailed assertion.
A Sunday New York Times story about Republican refusal to just accept the outcomes of authentic elections headlined “Echoing Trump, These Republicans Won’t Promise to Accept 2022 Results” indicated a spokesperson for Diehl replied “no comment” when requested if the previous state consultant would settle for the outcomes of the upcoming election.
Diehl’s Democratic rival, Attorney General Maura Healey, can be quoted within the article, and her marketing campaign on Sunday attacked the “no comment” reply given by Diehl spokesperson Peggy Rose as an indication Diehl wouldn’t settle for the outcomes of the election.
“The choice in this election could not be more clear. Geoff Diehl is endorsed by Donald Trump and has fully embraced the Trump playbook of lies and division. He repeats Trump’s false claims that the 2020 election was rigged and is already laying the groundwork to cast doubt on the results of our election because he knows that voters will reject his efforts to bring Trumpism to Massachusetts,” Healey Campaign Manager Jason Burrell stated.
Diehl advised the Herald he isn’t going to place the cart earlier than the horse.
“It is ridiculous and preposterous to ask any candidate — Democrat or Republican — for any public office to blindly accept the results of an election that hasn’t even happened yet and to thereby waive their legal right and responsibility to raise questions and assert challenges if appropriate,” he stated.
However the Whitman Republican stated that if he noticed no cause to not settle for the outcomes, he would.
“If I see problems with the voting process that I believe in good faith cast doubt on its outcome, I intend to call out those problems and seek resolution by means of accepted legal process. Once those means are exhausted, or if there are no such irregularities in the first place, the election is over and its results must be respected according to our democratic tradition,” Diehl stated.
“Any insinuation that I would resort to any methods to protest any election outside of legally-accepted means and consistent with the rule of law is demeaning, offensive, and most of all categorically false,” he stated.
Still, in line with Diehl, he could have good cause to be involved in regards to the outcomes of future elections held in Massachusetts.
“I think every American — Democrat and Republican alike — should be concerned about any insufficiency, error, or external force that could influence the outcome of an upcoming election. I also have concerns about the future integrity of our election process here in Massachusetts, given Governor Baker’s past statement that issuing driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants in this state ‘significantly increases the risk that noncitizens will be registered to vote.’” he stated.
The Legislature, in June, handed the Work and Family Mobility Act over Gov. Charlie Baker’s veto. It will enable those that can’t display lawful presence within the U.S. to make use of house nation paperwork to ascertain their id and obtain driver’s licenses. The state additionally robotically registers eligible voters upon issuance of a license, which opponents of the regulation preserve will inevitably end in unauthorized voter registrations and poll casting.
Source: www.bostonherald.com”