Hey, Maura Healey and Democrats — you’re really not working in opposition to Donald Trump.
Just so you understand.
The Democratic gubernatorial nominee would like to make this a contest in opposition to Trump, however he’s not on the poll.
Yes, Healey is a big favourite to win, however Massachusetts voters deserve an actual debate between her and GOP opponent Geoff Diehl based mostly on points, not a personality-driven agenda. Trump shall be one of many points, however not the one one.
Taxes. Education. Vaccine mandates.
These are the a number of the points voters care about probably the most — not what Trump says or does.
Diehl, a former state legislator, actually is a Trump supporter and he can’t and shouldn’t run away from that. But the previous president is just not a mouthpiece for Diehl.
Voters right here deserve greater than only a debate over “Trumpism.”
After eight years of Charlie Baker, Massachusetts is at a vital juncture.
Will the state proceed with the extra reasonable insurance policies of Baker, or will it flip to the extremes — both on the left or proper?
Healey, the state’s legal professional normal for the final eight years, sued Trump almost 100 instances and has aligned herself on the left. She clearly would flip the state in that route, however will she permit her governorship to be taken over by the intense left wing?
Healey has previously praised the Republican governor Baker for his bipartisanship and on Wednesday, a day after she coasted to victory within the main, she promised to push “a message of optimism and a spirit of getting things done.”
She and her new working mate, Kim Driscoll, rejected Republican claims that they characterize the “radical” left.
“We are about getting things done, we are about delivering for people and not dividing them, we are about putting people first and rising above the noise, the division, the partisanship, the politics,” she stated.
If that’s true, then why did Healey spend a lot taxpayer time and cash submitting lawsuits in opposition to Trump?
Healey and Diehl have already agreed to debate, although it’s not clear but when and the place that can occur.
Diehl, in a press convention in West Roxbury, stated he deliberate to speak about parental rights within the colleges and can help a referendum to repeal the Legislature’s latest legislation giving drivers’ licenses to immigrants right here illegally.
He additionally pledged to dispose of vaccine mandates and rent all of the state staff who misplaced their jobs due to the mandates.
Diehl can be smart to push the agenda he sketched out and keep away from getting concerned in an argument over Trump.
And Healey can be sensible to embrace extra reasonable insurance policies and stand as much as Democratic lawmakers in the event that they attempt to mess with the 1986 legislation often called Chapter 62F, which ought to kick on this 12 months and provides again taxpayers almost $3 billion in refunds or rebates.
Source: www.bostonherald.com”