Interim Suffolk DA Kevin Hayden took contemporary intention at his major election rival, demanding metropolis councilor Ricardo Arroyo reply questions associated to an alleged undisclosed previous sexual-assault investigation leaked final week.
“Voters deserve to know why Ricardo Arroyo contacted a victim mere hours after claiming to know nothing about the allegations or the women who made them,” a marketing campaign spokesperson for Hayden mentioned in a Sunday launch.
“Since these allegations surfaced, Arroyo has pointed fingers and engaged in distraction schemes. But he hasn’t answered any questions. How did he know this victim accused him? Why did he say he knew nothing about the allegations or the women involved and then immediately contact one of the victims?” the marketing campaign mentioned.
Arroyo, the town council’s vice chairman and likewise candidate for Suffolk DA, was allegedly the topic of two sexual-assault investigations when he was a youngster, in 2005 and 2007, based on the Boston Globe. The investigations by no means resulted in any fees.
Arroyo claims the paperwork from which the allegations spring had been leaked by Hayden’s workplace in an try by Hayden or somebody engaged on his behalf to assist him win the September major.
“BPD has done an investigation and concluded that these records, which are illegal to leak, were not accessed from BPD. The only other place they reside are the Suffolk County DA’s Office. It’s clear that either DA Hayden or someone associated with him illegally leaked those files and did so in a way that intentionally withheld exculpatory information with the intent of misleading voters,” Arroyo’s marketing campaign advised the Herald Sunday.
Arroyo’s marketing campaign additional claims that the leak was itself a prison act and that one of many alleged victims is definitely a supporter of his run for district legal professional.
“The illegal leak – which is punishable by a year in prison – did not include the fact that the 2005 case was determined by law enforcement to be unfounded. In addition, the individual from 2007 is on the record saying Ricardo never assaulted her and has endorsed Ricardo. She has been clear that it is Kevin Hayden who is victimizing her. Kevin Hayden is the one who needs to answer for why he abused the public’s trust for his own political gain,” the Arroyo marketing campaign mentioned.
Hayden’s crew appears to assume previous allegations towards Arroyo, which they are saying had been apparently not included on Arroyo’s utility to the Massachusetts Bar Association, as required by that affiliation’s guidelines, disqualify him for the job.
“All of this points to a person who not only lacks the professional experience to be District Attorney but the moral character as well. Voters need to know that the person holding the highest law enforcement job in the county is personally and professionally honest. This does not appear to be the case with Ricardo Arroyo,” the marketing campaign mentioned in an announcement.
Dorchester Councilor Frank Baker has filed an order compelling Mayor Michelle Wu to show over “any” paperwork associated to alleged sexual assault complaints towards Ricardo Arroyo.
A replica of the “Section 17F” problem obtained by the Herald states Baker is searching for experiences “related to any of the Boston Police Department’s investigation” of Arroyo “while preserving the victims’ privacy.”
The outcomes of the Democratic major on September 6 will successfully decide who the following district legal professional is, as there isn’t a Republican actively searching for the workplace.
Source: www.bostonherald.com”